Harmful to who? Or is it whom?
Who is the arbiter of what is or isn’t?
Politicians need to be gaoled for being antithetical to the publik welfare.
No way to know what “Harmfull” is to each individual person.
Harmfull to one person is the truth to another.
This is nothing new. The two gentlemen pictured below pioneered the concept 90 years ago. Funny how most wokesters canât see that.
Speak the truth about moe-ham-head, the pedophile prophet, and get beheaded in prison.
And she is in the “Conservative” party.
That would mean jailing all owners and managers at Google, Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, TikTok, and many more.
But, by harmful, the UK minister likely wants his side to be the interpreter and arbitrator and monitor of what’s harmful. Fairness would dictate that, all sides view and decide what’s harmful to their sides. In that case,there would be no social media sites left on the internet.
The Fakeservative Party rules in the UK the Lavatories.
And yeah the Labor Party waiting in the wings is just as Soviet in their thinking.
And all the while the British government-media propaganda machine decries the evils of Vladimir Putin in Russia.
George Orwell, call your office.
Or, just block access for Brits to those social media sites and instead give them a message when they try to login that their government is a tyranny, so they can’t use the site until they clean that mess up.
And this is the so called Conservative Party.
The UK has a “Conservative” government.