He just said, by means of a question, that he and those of his colleagues that constituted a deciding majority in Dobbs are not responsible for the leak of the Dobbs draft. He has personally concluded who the leaker is, but being Catholic knows where the line is beyond which he could credibly be accused of calumny or at least detraction for parting with that personal conclusion. What more do you want from him?
I expected him to be a leader and defend his staff. Not only that, he chose not to be interviewed. He allowed his staff to get the gut punch.
He just said, by means of a question, that he and those of his colleagues that constituted a deciding majority in Dobbs are not responsible for the leak of the Dobbs draft.>>> The case was decided 6 -3 he said the five of us leaving one of the other 4 as the possible leaker. That might include Roberts in the 4.