Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court unanimously rejects ethics complaints by Democrats against Justice Clarence Thomas
The Blaze ^ | April 30, 2023 | Paul Sacca

Posted on 05/01/2023 7:53:24 AM PDT by Twotone

The United States Supreme Court unanimously rejected ethics complaints about Justice Clarence Thomas by Democrats.

Sen Richard Durbin (D-Ill.), chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, sent a letter on April 20 requesting Chief Justice John Roberts appear for a hearing about potential conflicts of interest within the top court. The letter was signed by all 11 Democrats on the Judiciary Committee.

The letter follows a ProPublica article about Justice Clarence Thomas reportedly receiving gifts from a billionaire conservative donor and friend. Justice Thomas has denied any wrongdoing. Democrats have also targeted Justice Neil Gorsuch for alleged ethical lapses.

Durbin claimed that there is a "crisis of public confidence" in the Supreme Court, adding that the "status quo is no longer tenable."

"The time has come for a new public conversation on ways to restore confidence in the Court’s ethical standards," Durbin wrote.

Roberts fired off his own letter declining to appear for the hearing.

"I must respectfully decline your invitation," Roberts told Durbin. "Testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee by the Chief Justice of the United States is exceedingly rare as one might expect in light of separation of powers concerns and the importance of preserving judicial independence."

Roberts pointed out that Supreme Court justices have only testified before Congress for reasons other than nominations or appropriations on two occasions.

Then, all nine Supreme Court justices unanimously rejected Durbin's request.

"The undersigned Justices today reaffirm and restate foundational ethics principles and practices to which they subscribe in carrying out their responsibilities as Members of the Supreme 4 Court of the United States," the justices stated in a letter. "This statement aims to provide new clarity to the bar and to the public on how the Justices address certain recurring issues, and also seeks to dispel some common misconceptions."

"The Justices, like other federal judges, consult a wide variety of authorities to address specific ethical issues," the SCOTUS letter read. "They may turn to judicial opinions, treatises, scholarly articles, disciplinary decisions, and the historical practice of the Court and the federal judiciary. They may also seek advice from the Court's Legal Office and from their colleagues."

Durbin said on Thursday, "Supreme Court ethics reform must happen whether the Court participates in the process or not. It is time for Congress to accept its responsibility to establish an enforceable code of ethics for the Supreme Court, the only agency of our government without it."

Durbin asked Roberts to provide more details in writing regarding how the Supreme Court drafted its ethics statement and how it enforces it.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clarencethomas; durbin; ethicscomplaint; hightechlynching; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: Twotone

DemonRat racists still trying to ‘high tech lynch’ Justice Clarence Thomas. They’re not worthy to even lick the heels of this great man’s shoes. Scums of the lowest order.


21 posted on 05/01/2023 12:29:36 PM PDT by tflabo (Truth or tyranny )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

+1 for Separation of Powers

Justices knew enough to stick together


22 posted on 05/01/2023 1:18:06 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

.


23 posted on 05/01/2023 1:42:49 PM PDT by nutmeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: struggle; Twotone; FRiends
They’re doing this because they know that the info about Sotomayor leaking Dobbs is coming out.

^^THIS^^

24 posted on 05/01/2023 3:30:04 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have, 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

“This is how the DemocRATs will justify putting 4 or more additional Justices on the Supreme Court...”

Sadly, I think I’ll see this happen in my lifetime. :(


25 posted on 05/01/2023 3:34:14 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have, 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

I really wish our side would fight this dirty. Socialist Democrats throw every piece of shiite they can find against the wall and a LOT of times it sticks!

And where are our ‘republican’ counterparts? Hiding under their beds or attending parties to money-grub and get re-elected!

Term. Limits. Yesterday!

Gawd, how I LOATHE them all!


26 posted on 05/01/2023 3:36:30 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have, 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

Maybe it’s about time the justices started listening to complaints about Durbin; I’m sure there are a few.


27 posted on 05/01/2023 4:34:49 PM PDT by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldtech

The SC isn’t going to let that horse our of the barn because they know they’ll never get it back in


28 posted on 05/01/2023 6:26:38 PM PDT by jneesy (Good lord we have Jimmy Carters dumb cousin in the white house)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

I’m gobsmacked! I never dreamt that such a rebuke would happen!


29 posted on 05/01/2023 6:56:24 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

The SC voted to hear a case which could overturn the Chevron Doctrine. It’s impossible to state how much that would kneecap the liberals. THAT’S why they’re trying everything to remove a conservative justice now.


30 posted on 05/01/2023 7:01:05 PM PDT by Basket_of_Deplorables (THE FBI INTERFERED IN THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

Haha! Losers got smacked down.


31 posted on 05/01/2023 8:05:10 PM PDT by vmpolesov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

Durbin called m Army son a “Nazi” for liberating 25 million people from a real fascist, Saddam Hussein and his torturer sons.

By the way, we are Jewish and lost a whole side of our family to Nazi executioners.

This SOB is the real fascist. May he drop dead yesterday!!


32 posted on 05/01/2023 8:33:14 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper (Figures )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrankRizzo890

To paraphrase George Carlin, It’s a small club.

You expect any of the 9 to allow anything harmful against themselves?


33 posted on 05/02/2023 12:10:30 AM PDT by SPDSHDW (Ron DeSantis. The latest GOPe champion in a long list of winners. Jeb! Mitt Romney, and John McStain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

Racists democrats doing this.

They hate blacks.

Especially conservative blacks.

After all dems started the KKK.


34 posted on 05/02/2023 2:57:16 AM PDT by Syncro (Truth and Facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone
Wow, signed by ALL 11 demoncrats on the Judiciary Committee.!

I'm impressed.! I didn't think that many of them had enough sense to recall their own names..

35 posted on 05/02/2023 5:09:22 AM PDT by unread ("It's not enough that we do our best; sometimes we have to do what's required." W. Churchill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

Great news for Thomas, but I heard recently they are moving on to Gorsuch for some real estate deal. They are carpet bombing the USA.


36 posted on 05/02/2023 5:19:38 AM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww
all nine Supreme Court justices unanimously rejected Durbin’s request

That deserves a BOOM!!!

37 posted on 05/02/2023 5:21:25 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! Remember Gonzales! Come and Take It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: caww

Yes. “ For there but for the grace of God, go I”


38 posted on 05/02/2023 5:40:02 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

THe lefty twits have gone to the SCOTUS Justices homes, threatened their lives, leaked decicon on Abortion, and now file ethics cmpl;aints whichi are thwarted.

They now are caterwauling in public about establishing a 13 seat court to”balance the court.What they are doing is trying to politicize Justce and the law.

AMERICA NEEDS TO REJECT THESE RADICAL IDIOTS........AT THE POLLS.

Or soon there will be such disorder and crime that average , middle class Americans will have to resort to their 2nd amendment rights.

As for the SCOTUS Justices......I predict that assassination cannot be ruled out. They need full 24/7 security with armed guards at their homes prepared to shoot to kill.


39 posted on 05/02/2023 5:43:27 AM PDT by Candor7 ( ( Ask not for whom THE Trump trolls...He trolls for thee!)<img src=""width=500></img>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
"Gawd, how I LOATHE them all!"

I think the problem is the republicans have no goal.. As you say, their only goal seems to be, to go about collecting more money so they can stay on the gravy train..

On the other hand, the demoncrats are indeed working hard for the future.! And that future is the destruction of our nation as a free country and changing it to socialized hellhole..

The republicans are just setting on their duff and trying to play defense. ! It ain't working.! It's WAY past time for them to get the hell up and get in the game..!!

40 posted on 05/02/2023 5:48:30 AM PDT by unread ("It's not enough that we do our best; sometimes we have to do what's required." W. Churchill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson