Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Georgia Power completes hot functional testing at Plant Vogtle’s Unit 4
Capitol Beat ^ | 5/1/23 | Dave Williams

Posted on 05/02/2023 5:04:04 AM PDT by CFW

Georgia Power is making significant progress with the second of two additional nuclear reactors being built at Plant Vogtle even as the first of the new reactors prepares to go into commercial operation.

The Atlanta-based utility announced Monday the completion of hot functional testing for Unit 4 at the plant south of Augusta. Unit 4 is projected to begin operations late this year or early in 2024.

“The energy and enthusiasm at the Vogtle site, and across our entire company, is high with Unit 3 in the final stages of startup testing and Unit 4 making progress towards safely loading fuel,” said Kim Greene, Georgia Power’s chairman, president and CEO.

“The team at Unit 4 has been able to take lessons learned from Unit 3 and apply them. That has allowed us to safely complete hot functional testing on Unit 4 in significantly less time than we did for Unit 3.”

During hot functional testing, plant systems achieved normal operating pressure and temperature without nuclear fuel in the reactor to demonstrate the systems will operate as designed.

(Excerpt) Read more at capitol-beat.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: electricity; georgia; georgiapower; nuclearpower; vogtle; votgle
The first nuclear power plant built in our nation in several decades is now being completed. Unit 3 began producing electricity approximately one month ago, and Unit 4 will be producing electricity in about 8 months to a year from now. This is the way to efficient, clean, and abundant power.
1 posted on 05/02/2023 5:04:04 AM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CFW

German politicians are sad on this news.


2 posted on 05/02/2023 5:09:03 AM PDT by 2banana (Common ground with islamic terrorists-they want to die for allah and we want to arrange the meeting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

It’s pronounced “nuculear”


3 posted on 05/02/2023 5:13:25 AM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Now the leftists will start making movies about terrorists sabotaging nuclear plants so people will start protesting them. They can’t have America energy self sufficient. Their goal is to bring us down.


4 posted on 05/02/2023 5:14:07 AM PDT by ProudDeplorable (Concentrated power has always been the enemy of liberty. ~ Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProudDeplorable

“Now the leftists will start making movies about terrorists sabotaging nuclear plants so people will start protesting them.”


As long as they stay away from the plant itself they can shake their fists at the sky all they want. However, southern Georgia sheriffs will have no problem locking them up should they attempt to do anything more than that. That plant is very, very serious about its security.


5 posted on 05/02/2023 5:22:14 AM PDT by CFW (old and retired)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: ProudDeplorable

My first thought also ... I hope the construction budget included a big line item for construction and production security. While a hit from a kamakaze plane attack is unlikely, some thought about that possibility should have happened. Other possible attacks from shoulder held missiles and such should also be on the list.

After the Big Freeze last year I wrote my Texas state rep about getting some nukes on the planning table. They could be located way out in West Texas where there would be virtually no repercussions should there be an accident unlikely as it is. Crickets ...


7 posted on 05/02/2023 5:34:00 AM PDT by ByteMercenary (Cho Bi Dung and KamalHo are not my leaders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CFW; Kaslin; BenLurkin; Lazamataz; MHGinTN; SJackson; SunkenCiv; Red Badger; Liz; NicknamedBob

And thus their unforgivable error.

They “could have” generated billions in similar “lessons learned” at every stage of construction and testing had they scheduled nbr 4 about 24 months later. Dig the hole at Plant 3, place the rebar, place the penetrations, place the forms, pour the concrete, lay the steel, lay the upper forms. THEN, walk sideways a few hundred yards and do it again with the same crew.

Instead, they had two plants working at the same time. Learning the same lessons. Twice.

And TWO OTHER ONES up the road learning four more expensive lessons.


8 posted on 05/02/2023 5:48:14 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (Method, motive, and opportunity: No morals, shear madness and hatred by those who cheat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW
"That plant is very, very serious about its security."

Yes, they are. I taught a class for their security personnel down there a few years back. I was very impressed with the caliber of their people and their operational abilities.

9 posted on 05/02/2023 6:04:22 AM PDT by Raven6 (Psalm 144:1 and Proverbs 22:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ByteMercenary
“While a hit from a kamakaze plane attack”

IF the containment dome over the reactor is the same as the Seabrook plant in NH the concrete on that is six feet thick reinforced with rebar. It was designed to withstand a direct impact of a 747. It would disintegrate on impact similar to the 911 strike on the Pentagon.

10 posted on 05/02/2023 6:13:04 AM PDT by woodbutcher1963
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Raven6

“I taught a class for their security personnel down there a few years back. I was very impressed with the caliber of their people and their operational abilities.”


I believe for security operations they hire based upon merit and experience rather than DIE unprinciples.


11 posted on 05/02/2023 6:14:35 AM PDT by CFW (old and retired)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ByteMercenary

Not sure west Texas has the necessary water resources generally expected for nuclear power.


12 posted on 05/02/2023 7:11:01 AM PDT by newzjunkey (We need a better Trump than Trump in 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ProudDeplorable

Ah yes… just imagine how much GREENER we would be if the Left hadn’t run their anti-science campaign of anti-nuke power fear back in the seventies and onwards. R


13 posted on 05/02/2023 7:13:09 AM PDT by newzjunkey (We need a better Trump than Trump in 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Robert A Cook PE

At least they didn’t abandon the project with the cost overruns. There was a risk. This is one thing Georgia got right.


14 posted on 05/02/2023 7:14:57 AM PDT by newzjunkey (We need a better Trump than Trump in 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson