Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: No name given

I beg everyone here to read the entire article and think back to yourselves at age 10 and ask if you were ready for this type of sexual knowledge.

The only purpose for such “education” is to make a child ready for sexual activity (with the teacher?) at an earlier and earlier age.

This is sexual grooming by definition and should be against the law nationwide with no objections by anyone. Not by parents, teachers, politicians, and physicians, etc. one and all.


8 posted on 05/16/2023 6:39:51 PM PDT by CFW (old and retired)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: CFW

When I was ten I knew I kind of liked girls and some girls kind of liked me. I had no idea why, except they were cute and I liked them. I guarantee that I had no concept of sex whatsoever.

I remember reading some years ago about a sex ed curriculum proposed for New York City schools. It introduced information on sex acts that I had heard of (and was better off not knowing about) and I am a grown man who has been around the block a few times.


15 posted on 05/16/2023 9:07:59 PM PDT by Southside_Chicago_Republican (The more I learn about people, the more I like my dog. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson