This Ping List is for all news pertaining to infringes upon or victories for the 2nd Amendment.
FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from this Ping List.
More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.
Posted on 06/06/2023 8:47:50 PM PDT by CFW
Coming up a little later today we’ll be covering some good news from the federal judiciary, but let’s get the bad news out of the way first. A federal judge in Washington State has turned away a request for an injunction halting enforcement of the state’s newly-imposed ban on the sale of so-called assault weapons, and for the most absurd reason you can imagine.
(Excerpt) Read more at bearingarms.com ...
I've found the tie for stupidest statement by a judge. I assume the judge WANTS to be overturned based upon the little known doctrine called "Idiocracy".
Firearms Policy Coalition @gunpolicy
LEGAL ALERT: A judge has denied the motion for preliminary injunction in our lawsuit challenging Washington's "assault weapon ban," saying that the banned firearms "allow a shooter to fire as fast as they can pull the trigger, unlike previous guns."
Yep. Read that again. Slowly this time, and then point out to me the part that makes sense. I bet you will never find it.
.
.
.
.
Narrator: There is no part that makes sense.
Here is Cam Edwards’ cliff notes of the ruling.
“....Bryan's ruling is what it is, and Washington gun owners are unlikely to find any relief in the courts in the near term. The Ninth Circuit seems like an unlikely vehicle to grant an injunction against a ban on the sale of modern sporting rifles, and the Supreme Court is clearly taking a hands-off approach to intervening in preliminary injunctions. The best hope for relatively quick relief for Washington residents may like on the East Coast, where the Fourth Circuit is still holding on to a case challenging the state of Maryland's ban on modern sporting rifles....”
“You got to understand that the Soviet of Washington is and has been on the left coast for half a century or more.”
Our nation’s people are self-sorting and I suspect the sorting will be pretty much finished by the end of 2024. At that point the Court “wars” will start in earnest as the different Court districts reach opposing conclusions regarding basic rights. Who knows where it will go from there?
Trump’s/Mitch’s judges on the 9th circus are doing actual work and reverting a lot of Commie BS in relation to guns.
We got the 10 round limit on magazines tossed for a few months due to them, and I think the case is still in the courts.
“U.S. District Judge Robert Bryan, an 88-year-old first appointed to the bench by then-president Ronald Reagan in 1986”
The senile old fool is trashing the 2A out of grumpy old man spite. Despicable.
bkmk
If you can’t possess them and can’t legally get rid of them, then the only other solution is a boating accident.
EC
If you can’t possess them and can’t legally get rid of them, then the only other solution is a boating accident.
= = =
Thus the cause of rising sea levels.
You can keep the AR/AK firearms you possess, you just can’t buy, sell or transfer.
This Ping List is for all news pertaining to infringes upon or victories for the 2nd Amendment.
FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from this Ping List.
More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.
The judge is senile.
“If you can’t possess them and can’t legally get rid of them, then the only other solution is a boating accident.”
It’s that time of the year. A lot of boating accidents happen in June.
His knowledge of weaponry probably comes from watching re-enactors.
>You can keep the AR/AK firearms you possess, you just can’t buy, sell or transfer.<
Then I guess there will be a bunch of new widows who get thrown in the slammer. The didn’t own it and can’t get rid of it.
EC
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.