Florida statutes 934.03-934.09 say for a person to intercept a wire, oral, or electronic communication when all of the parties to the communication have given prior consent to such interception. (e) It is unlawful to intercept any wire, oral, or electronic communication for the purpose of committing any criminal act.
The supposed recording was illegal and should not be admitted into evidence.
Trump is not charged with state crimes.
All the charges are federal.
You are assuming that Trump did not know he was being recorded. Since the purpose of the meeting was to interview him for a book that was being written about Mark Meadows, I have no doubt that he knew he was being recorded. Trump has been interviewed for enough articles and books to know that it is standard practice to record them (no one takes shorthand anymore). In fact, I am pretty confident that the tape itself will have an acknowledgment by Trump that he knows he is being recorded, as protection for the writer so he didn’t get sued later.
Wasn’t it some kind of writer/journalist? If so, likley they were recording for a written piece and Trump knew t was being recorded—that is a key point—whether he knew or not.