[Robert DeLong]

So far, that is exactly what we are witnessing, and bright people like Thomas Massey & the 19 Democrat Schiff supporters fail to see that we need to use the same tactics upon the Democrats as they continually use on Republicans, and more importantly, their supporters. That tactic is unrestrained lawfare. While I may agree with their personal take on the issue, I disagree with their employing that personal take in this war. It's pure idiocy, and is why we are seeing our nation slipping away, and descending into the hell of being just another shithole in the world of shithole governments.

They better wake up, because they are only helping the enemy when they play by the rules, which have been tossed into the trash can by the enemy. Once we get control we can create safeguards against the lawfare tactic being used to accomplish goals.

[4Liberty]

Yes. The 20 who voted against censoring Adam Schiff argued that "Constitutional issues" such infringing Rep Schiffs's right to free speech and the risk retaliatory fines against GOP Reps were solid reasons to vote No.

They don't get it!

This is called LAWFARE. Let THE DEMS waste time & resources arguing against its "Constitutionality" -- after its passage. As Dan Bongino says: "New Rules."

[Sarcazmo]

I agree, but I have a feeling we could never play by their rules. I don’t think we have come to terms with the rules they’re playing by.

I highly suspect our opponents are making very serious threats against our key players.

It’s not in our nature to play by those rules.

[Texas Fossil]

We MUST make that happen.