1 posted on
06/21/2023 4:09:40 PM PDT by
bitt
To: null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; bitt; ...
2 posted on
06/21/2023 4:09:54 PM PDT by
bitt
(<img src=' 'width=40%>)
To: bitt
As we expected, it was a SHAM investigation all along meant to simply protect the Deep State!
3 posted on
06/21/2023 4:11:53 PM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Trump has all the right enemies, DeSantis has all the wrong friends.)
To: bitt
So all President Trump had to do with Mueller was decline to be interviewed and all would be well?
To: bitt
8 posted on
06/21/2023 4:39:58 PM PDT by
Apparatchik
(If you find yourself in a confusing situation, simply laugh knowingly and walk away - Jim Ignatowski)
To: bitt
Please tell me again Mr. Durham, why, when you’re investigating possible criminal acts, you don’t round the suspects up, and bring them in for questioning? Even if they choose to say nothing, you still bring them in, and put their refusal to cooperate on record. Where’s the law that says you have to invite suspected criminals to be interviewed?
10 posted on
06/21/2023 4:48:37 PM PDT by
mass55th
("Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway." ~~ John Wayne )
To: bitt
Took the 5th I guess lol:-)
12 posted on
06/21/2023 4:56:46 PM PDT by
Harpotoo
(Being a socialist is a lot easier than having to WORK like the rest of US:-))
To: bitt
So, the ring-leaders of the entire seditious plot refused to testify and weren't even subpoenaed to answer for their actions?
That's not suspicious. That's proof. This was a sham investigation.
14 posted on
06/21/2023 5:31:18 PM PDT by
Gritty
(The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the Revolution. - Saul Alinsky)
To: bitt
What the heck? Durham was doing a criminal investigation and these FBI dirt bags broke the law
15 posted on
06/21/2023 6:47:41 PM PDT by
rdcbn1
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
