Posted on 06/29/2023 12:05:19 PM PDT by Morgana
President Joe Biden on Thursday blasted the landmark Supreme Court decision that ended affirmative action in college admissions - and said it is proof discrimination 'still exists in America'.
'This is not a normal court,' Biden said of the conservative-majority bench that ruled race-based admissions programs at Harvard and the University of North Carolina (UNC) are unconstitutional.
'I know today's court decision is a severe disappointment to so many people, including me, but we cannot let the decision be a permanent setback,' he said in remarks in the Roosevelt Room of the White House.
In two rulings on Thursday, the conservative majority of the high court overturned admissions plans at Harvard and the University of North Carolina, the nation's oldest private and public colleges.
The ruling overturned a decades-old policy meant to boost the number of black, Asian and Latino students in universities. The vote was 6-3 in the North Carolina case and 6-2 in the Harvard case - with liberal justice Ketanji Brown Jackson recused.
In his remarks, Biden acknowledged that many Americans believe affirmative action gives unfair advantages to minorities when it comes to college admission but, he noted, that is not the case.
'Many people wrongly believe affirmative action allows unqualified students to be admitted ahead of qualified students. This is not how college admissions work,' he said.
He argued universities make a pool of qualified students and, from there, add in other factors like grades and race.
The president encouraged universities to still consider the 'hardships' students had to overcome in order to apply to college and proposed that schools 'take into account the adversity a student has overcome.'
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Biden’s personal doctor is most certainly NOT an affirmative action candidate.
This was a minor hit against the communist plan to destroy America. But its too late, and China Biden is already spouting how to get around it.
He knows normal? He did not know there was a sandbag on the stage when he fell over it!
“The president encouraged universities to still consider the ‘hardships’ students had to overcome in order to apply to college and proposed that schools ‘take into account the adversity a student has overcome.’”
There’s another lawsuit.
I’ve personally witnessed that form of reverse discrimination for 30 years. Hey Joey, you voted for this crap when you were a Senator. I’d ask if you remember, but you would just LIE about it anyway.
Dark Brandon is afraid affirmative action is all that’s keeping him in the WH. LOL
It’s normal, you’re not!
There is a mountain of evidence that grades and tests predict success in college, and when they’re ignored failure can be accurately predicted as well. Admitting unqualified and under qualified students in to Ivy League schools sets them up to fail. My sources are Dr. Charles Murray and Dr. Thomas Sowell.
Harvard said it will ‘comply’ with the Supreme Court ruling, however, they admitted they will still use an applicant’s essay discussing how ‘race affected his or her life’ during the admissions process.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/06/harvard-says-it-will-use-college-application-essays/
So NOW this idiot in the WH believes that applying for college is a hardship, LOL, LOL, GIVE ME A DAMN BREAK!!
Joe Biden: He argued universities make a pool of qualified students and, from there, add in other factors like grades and race.
Qualified has nothing to do with it. It’s a competition for seats. Not every qualified person get an opportunity, and that’s the way it is. If they are going to use race for college quotas, then they need to sue the same demographic for the NBA. Everyone who has a high school graduation probably qualifies for Harvard…….just like everyone would be qualified for the NBA.
I do agree that using socioeconomic factors should be ok. That’s not the same as ‘race’. Poor and rural kids, from areas and parents don’t necessarily have equal opportunity. That should be considered. Not race and not race quotas.
Awwwww....
School choice would eliminate that factor as well, open up opportunities for all kids, regardless of socio economics, the money follows the student.
Unqualified students are how they get moron professors. The idiots can’t do anything outside of academia, so they stay there and celebrate and push their idiocy.
The biggest piece of garbage in the history of the White House. No close second.
By a vote of 6-3 (UNC) and 6-2 (Harvard) the court ruled the admissions programs used by the University of North Carolina and Harvard College violate the Constitution’s equal protection clause barring racial discrimination by government entities.
Chief Justice John Roberts writing the opinion of the majority said that for too long universities have “concluded, wrongly, that the touchstone of an individual’s identity is not challenges bested, skills built, or lessons learned but the color of their skin. Our constitutional history does not tolerate that choice.”
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, a woman of notoriously activist disposition defined by her self-image and race, sat out the Harvard case because she had been a member of an advisory governing board who constructed the rules the Supreme Court now determined were unlawful.
Amy Howe – […] Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts explained that college admissions programs can consider race merely to allow an applicant to explain how their race influenced their character in a way that would have a concrete effect on the university. But a student “must be treated based on his or her experiences as an individual — not on the basis of race,” Roberts wrote. The majority effectively, though not explicitly, overruled its 2003 decision in Grutter v. Bollinger, in which the court upheld the University of Michigan Law School’s consideration of race “as one factor among many, in an effort to assemble a student body that is diverse in ways broader than race.”
Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented, in an opinion that was joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson. Sotomayor emphasized that the majority’s decision had rolled “back decades of precedent and momentous progress” and “cement[ed] a superficial rule of colorblindness as a constitutional principle in an endemically segregated society.”
Thursday’s ruling was the latest in a series of challenges to the role of race in university admissions. In both the North Carolina and Harvard cases, the plaintiffs had asked the justices to overrule Grutter. In her opinion for the majority in that case, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor reaffirmed that “student body diversity is a compelling state interest that can justify the use of race in university admissions,” but she warned that race-conscious admissions policies should not last forever. In 25 years, she suggested, “the use of racial preferences will no longer be necessary to further the interest” in diversity. (read more)
Associated Press – “Former President Donald Trump, the current GOP presidential frontrunner, wrote on his social media network that the decision marked “a great day for America. People with extraordinary ability and everything else necessary for success, including future greatness for our Country, are finally being rewarded.”
Former President Barack Obama said in a statement that affirmative action “allowed generations of students like Michelle and me to prove we belonged. Now it’s up to all of us to give young people the opportunities they deserve — and help students everywhere benefit from new perspectives.” (more)
In the bigger picture, the need for control is a reaction to fear.
Think in terms or politics and society – the fear behind the leftist worldview is the fear that someone might withhold things (opportunities, money, whatever) from me. Fear that if you live your life in a way I dislike, it might affect my life. Fear that if you get that job, there will be nothing left for me.
A fear that if you make tons of money, it’s means there’s less money out there for me. So, people who believe in leftist ideologies seek control, manipulation and rules as a means of trying to create guarantees and safeguards against those circumstances they fear.
Conservatives believe in equal opportunity. Leftists believe in equal outcomes.
Modern “liberals”, ie leftists, try to control the world and people to enable their comfort and happiness. Which, as we know, is an endless quest. Trying to control others does nothing in the way of making oneself happy. By extension, voting in this mindset so that government can try to control others will also – shocking – not lead to a happier, more comfortable life.
The conservative (and moderate, independent, but for the sake of expediency, the conservative), on the other hand, relies on himself to meet his own needs. And the tradeoff of being free to live his life as he wishes is also understanding that he has to make peace with how you live yours. By extension, aware that he wants to be able to hold onto this liberty and freedom forever, the conservative votes accordingly, so that everyone can remain free and in charge of his or her own life.
But here’s the crucial difference, perhaps, particularly where misery on the left stems: The conservative does not worry, so to speak, about you.
The conservative person knows that you were born with the same access to self-love, self-empowerment, self-determination and self-reliance that we all were, no matter the circumstances into which you were born. (Think about the millions of people this country has allowed to crawl up from poverty into prosperity – the conservative KNOWS this is possible.) And the conservative believes that if you want prosperity, or a good job, or a good education, you can make it happen – but you have to work hard.
The conservative hopes and intends the free markets bring you all of the affordable and positive opportunities and resources that you need. The conservative also knows that on the other side of that hard work is great reward – material and, more importantly, emotional, spiritual and mental.
The conservative understands that not only is it a waste of time to try to control you, but it’s also actually impossible.
Humans were born to be free. And if we put a roadblock in front of you, you’ll find another way around it. So, we see attempts at control as a waste of resources, energy and time at best, and at worst, creating detrimental results that serve to hinder people’s upward mobility or teach dependence. We see much more efficiency, as well as endless opportunity, in leaving you to your own devices. And we want the same in return.
This is where modern democrats’ mis-view conservatives as heartless. But really, the conservative believes that there is one and one path only to sustainable success and independence – and that is self-empowerment. All other avenues – welfare, affirmative action, housing loans you can’t actually afford – ultimately risk doing a disservice to people as they teach dependence on special circumstances, the govt, or arbitrary assistance (that can disappear tomorrow). And the real danger – they will ALWAYS backfire and leave the recipient in equally or more dire circumstances. Any false improvement will always expire.
The conservative believes in abundance. The liberal believes in scarcity.
The conservative believes man is born free and will be who he is, no matter what arbitrary limitations or rules are put on him. The leftist believes man is perfectible, and by extension, believes a society at large is perfectible, and command and control is justified in the quest to a “perfect” utopian society. (Sounds familiar!)
The conservative tends to be more faithful – and not necessarily in God, but in the ability of the individual to find great strength in himself (or from his God) to get what he needs and to be successful. Therefore, the conservative has an outlet for his fear and disappointment – trust and faith in something bigger.
The leftist believes the system must be perfected in order to enable success. Therefore, disappointment is channeled as anger and blame at the system. Voids are left to be filled by faith in the govt, which they surely then want to come in and “fix” things.
And therein lies the roots of love and fear respectively. For the conservative, when life presents great struggles, he knows he has the power to surmount them. Happiness stems from internal strength and perseverance. For the modern leftist, when life presents great struggles, the system failed, therefore they were at the mercy of a faulty system, and they believe that only when the system is fixed can their life improve. Happiness is built on systemic contingencies, which they will then seek to control or expect someone else to.
One blames himself. The other blames anyone and everyone but himself.
And there it is….. There’s where the meanness comes from. The leftist ideology causes that person to cast anger at the world when things go wrong or appear “unfair.” He constantly chooses only to see the “injustices” – and that makes for a very miserable, mean, blame-casting existence.
I’m sure when Joe went to college, they passed on some bright, black fellow to allow whitey Joe in, and he would have been just fine with that back then.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.