She has always been a selfish, arrogant type who thinks her personal biases should be the interpretation of the laws. She has vitually no knowledge of law as several critics have pointed out as her contributions to legal rulings almost never cited precedents. Her bias rules.
As to this current statement, I submit she is a lying, dog faced pony soldier.
So you tell me that a brain-dead socialist Demonrat disagrees with the constitution? Duh!