To: SeekAndFind
Anyone see this affecting recording laws in other states yet?
2 posted on
07/05/2023 10:20:11 PM PDT by
Reno89519
(DeSantis 2024. Successful Governor, Honorable Veteran, Respectful, Respected.)
To: SeekAndFind
Leave it to an ObamaStooge to dissent.
3 posted on
07/05/2023 10:27:48 PM PDT by
kiryandil
(China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
To: SeekAndFind
Wait till the schoolkids learn about this.
To: SeekAndFind
To: SeekAndFind
The law is contentcontext-based because certain groups, such as the law enforcement officers, are treated different than others, Ms. Ikuta said. That means it has to be narrowly tailored for a compelling governmental interest, or survive a test known as strict scrutiny.The recorded utterances (e.g.: "I'd like a ham-and-cheese sandwich, please," "My, you look pretty!", or "I'm going to beat your ass!") might be IDENTICAL.
Rather, it's the context that counts.
Regards,
14 posted on
07/06/2023 3:27:03 AM PDT by
alexander_busek
(Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
To: SeekAndFind
Virginia has a “one-side” consent law that works well. Recording conversations is legal if at least one person in the conversation knows it’s being recorded. That keeps people from bugging phones or houses without letting someone else know.
Unless you’re a cop with a warrant.
15 posted on
07/06/2023 6:11:30 AM PDT by
VanShuyten
("...that all the donkeys were dead. I know nothing as to the fate of the less valuable animals)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson