Posted on 07/14/2023 6:52:02 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Covid injections caused or contributed to 74 percent of deaths after inoculation. That’s according to a Lancet review of autopsy data of more than 300 post-injection deaths. But good luck finding the paper — The Lancet scrubbed it within 24 hours.
Other stories in today’s show include: An unclassified report developed from the Office of Naval Intelligence reveals the frighteningly deteriorated status of U.S. Navy shipbuilding capability; U.S. Senator Tommy Tuberville’s (Ala.) pledge to block officer nominations on the Senate floor is going into its fifth month; the saga of fugitive whistleblower Gal Luft took another turn yesterday; and congressional Republicans are looking to eliminate Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas’ salary.
In the second half of the show, investigative journalist William F. Jasper discusses the fastest growing criminal enterprise in the world and the available data suggesting people in high places are complicit; and members of The John Birch Society’s research and legislative team provide an update on the legislative fight against carbon-capture pipelines.
(Excerpt) Read more at thenewamerican.com ...
Forgot to link the video:
Can you please post the part of the article that deals with the headline and first paragraph?
Thank you!
It is a video. I posted the link in the second post. Thank you.
Ping again.
The “paper” did nothing of the sort.
It was a piece of antivax propaganda written in the style and language of a medical paper. It was written by some notorious antivaxxers who combed through hundreds of papers to find a handful of deaths (325 total) that they could blame on vaccines.
To put some perspective to this, they had to look really hard in order to find any deaths that were temporally related to Covid vaccination. And if that doesn’t tell you how rare death within days of vaccination is, here’s another perspective: 325 deaths out of 3.2 million deaths that occurred in 2022 is a pretty small fraction.
I looked at a couple of the papers to see what they were including as a “vaccine related” death. One death was in a young man who had a progressive untreated neurological disease for four years. Another death was in a Japanese girl who was found to have pneumonia at the time of death.
The antivax propagandists got their paper posted at The Lancet website and it was pulled hours later. Since the usual protocol is to send papers out for peer review and revision prior to posting them online, I’m guessing that The Lancet only posted an unreviewed paper because they want to get Covid related articles out as quickly as possible. And once their editorial staff got a chance to look at it, they realized it has no scientific value. Of course, for antivax propagandists, such an event is a goldmine. Now they can use it to claim that they are being censored and display their victimhood.
Be wary of antivax charlatans. Those who create the propaganda understand vaccines quite well and use their understanding to create unscientific yet plausible sounding misinformation. They don’t care how many people die from deadly diseases because they believed the propaganda and refused vaccines. Actually, I think they want people to die. The more people die from vaccine-preventable diseases, the fewer humans there are harming the environment.
“You’ve had a very violent reaction to something.”
“325 deaths out of 3.2 million deaths that occurred in 2022 is a pretty small fraction.”
It mattered to THOSE 325 Starfish!
Hospitals put every death as a kung flu death wether it was or not. Cha-ching.
I saw this. Lancet pulled it. McCullough embarrassed himself.
It was a shameful ‘study’.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.