Major Film Critics Boycott ‘Sound of Freedom’ Despite Box Office Success

MSN ^

[MNDude]

The recently released anti-child-trafficking drama, “Sound of Freedom,” starring Jim Caviezel, has faced a widespread boycott from major film critics. Notable outlets such as the New York Times, Los Angeles Times, and The Hollywood Reporter have chosen not to run reviews of the film, while only a few outlets, including Variety, Rolling Stone, and RogerEbert.com, have provided reviews since its release on July 4. The reasons for the boycott and lack of coverage remain unclear, as critics and film editors have not responded to inquiries

[Gay State Conservative]

I'll buy the DVD

[\/\/ayne]

Because it’s about them.

[Ge0ffrey]

It’s like the Soviet Union.

[Fledermaus]

Notable outlets? Left wing tripe.

[RushIsMyTeddyBear]

Bingo.

[Wilderness Conservative]

Every coke shipment and child sex slave has a buyer. They are all showing who they are.

[shalom aleichem]

The Hollywood elite are boycotting the film in hopes it will just go away. Hunan sex trafficking is a huge “industry” and as the casting couch scenario is well know, Hollywood is a major consuner and promoter of underage sex.

The hottest part of Hell is ready for these “people”.

[Cincinnatus.45-70]

Vampires can’t stand sunlight or mirrors.

[coloradan]

When virtue signaling looks more like depravity signaling. Cat got your tongues? A little too close to home?

[jonrick46]

I had to order my tickets early. If I delayed, there would only be front row seats or, the showing sold out.

When the DVD is available in Blue Ray, I am buying.

[Impala64ssa]

Because it’s about them.
This can also explain why the overwhelming majority of those in H-wood favor stricter gun laws. Pervy Weinstein gave away the game a few years ago when he said he's making it his mission to destroy the NRA. Why would someone in the trick bag he's in say that? Only difference between Weinstein and 99.9% of the rest of H-wood is he was stupid enough to get caught. The rampant sex abuse and child molestation in the sleazy world of show biz has been a poorly kept dirty little secret for over 100 years. No wonder why the overpaid mannequins love to throw their star power behind the gun grabbers. After all sex abuse victims capable of shooting back in self defense and parents having easy access to firearms are BAD FOR BUSINESS

[cowboyusa]

Rodger Ebert was a whiny little leftist, but if a film was goid, he would say it was good.

[Sarah Barracuda]

Figures pro pedo leftists would boycott a movie about child sex trafficking, pedo’s are the left’s main voting block

[jonrick46]

In the Soviet Union you would be moved to Siberia and no one in your family would be permitted to be employed. Your friends and neighbors would have to support your family while you wasted away in a Soviet s-h.

[Pollard]

Same here. Closest place I could go watch it is 80 miles away up near the city.

[FlingWingFlyer]

Something about human-trafficking really upsets these far lefties. They’re more upset now than they were when Epstein was arrested and they had to kill himself. One of these days those beans are going to spill and we’ll know who all these traffickers are.

[I want the USA back]

Proof that the dem party in 100% in favor of trafficking humans. They’re all rallying for the traffickers. Are the traffickers paying the dems?

[Steely Tom]

Like anyone cares what they say.

[ChildOfThe60s]

The reasons for the boycott and lack of coverage remain unclear, as critics and film editors have not responded to inquiries

Because the perverts stick together. The left is the haven of the pedos and perverts. The hollyweird people are up to their butts in this perversion. What would happen if people really knew how many pedos there are in hollywood (and DC)?

Would the sheep *finally* look up? I wonder if anthing short of a flash of light and pillars of salt will do it.