Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump screens 'Sound of Freedom,' seeking to rally evangelicals around fear of child trafficking
ABC News ^

Posted on 07/20/2023 10:52:13 AM PDT by MNDude

ormer President Donald Trump on Wednesday night hosted a screening of the film "Sound of Freedom" at his golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey, one day after the revelation that special counsel Jack Smith has informed Trump he is a target of the federal investigation into his efforts to overturn the 2020 election.

Trump has regularly kept up his campaign schedule despite mounting legal problems, including two indictments to which he has pleaded not guilty. He has also denied wrongdoing related to the 2020 election.

Wednesday's event has a specific purpose, according to his campaign: to burnish both his record on human trafficking and his credentials with evangelical Christians, who are a key bloc in states like Iowa that are early in the GOP primary race.

"Sound of Freedom" emerged as a surprising box office success this summer, driven in part by conservative and religious audiences, according to analysts. Distributed by an independent company, it has built a nearly $100 million following -- and counting -- and has been buoyed by positive reviews and word of mouth.

But the film has some critics, too, who argue the film inaccurately depicts the reality of child sex trafficking.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bias; chat; childsextrafficking; eaststlittlebitch; littlebitcheasyst; mediabias; news; soundoffreedom; timballard; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 07/20/2023 10:52:13 AM PDT by MNDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MNDude

Trump viewed this because of two reasons, but not the two cited. 1) Jim C. is a huge supporter for all the right reasons. 2) Trump has a legitimate interest in the topic, unlike the Democrats.


2 posted on 07/20/2023 10:54:11 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

“seeking to rally evangelicals”

Or maybe he just really likes the movie.


3 posted on 07/20/2023 10:58:21 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

“seeking to rally evangelicals around fear”

Thank you, ABC. What would we ever do without you?


4 posted on 07/20/2023 10:58:30 AM PDT by lowbridge ("Let’s check with Senator Schumer before we run it" - NY Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

>> Trump viewed this because of two reasons, but not the two cited.

YES. THANK YOU!

Not everything is political calculus. “You do the right thing BECAUSE it is the right thing to do.”


5 posted on 07/20/2023 11:00:25 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (Jesus is LORD and Savior! And Donald Trump is President of the United States of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MNDude
7smmb4 F0e6-EPPXs-AAgz-Jq
6 posted on 07/20/2023 11:01:09 AM PDT by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Epstein’s handlers and best clients are still running this clown show.

They are understandably distressed that this film finally managed to get shown.

~Easy


7 posted on 07/20/2023 11:02:03 AM PDT by EasySt (Say not this is the truth, but so it seems to me to be, as I see this thing I think I see. #MAGA-AaA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

Typical leftist drivel.

Attack the message. Not the facts. Bunch of pedophiles in the media. Light of day scares them to death.

Ok jackasses. What part of this story is not true?


8 posted on 07/20/2023 11:02:28 AM PDT by saleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

Is DNABC saying there is no child trafficking in America?


9 posted on 07/20/2023 11:03:30 AM PDT by bray (You can tell who the Commies fear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude
"But the film has some critics, too, who argue the film inaccurately depicts the reality of child sex trafficking."

Who are these "critics"? Pedos?

10 posted on 07/20/2023 11:05:02 AM PDT by Pajamajan ( PRAY FOR OUR NATION. Never be a slave in a new Socialist America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bray

“Is DNABC saying there is no child trafficking in America?”

At the very least, they are saying there is no reason to fear it.

Serious, I’d love to see these pedos and protectors of pedos thrown into a brazen bull.


11 posted on 07/20/2023 11:05:29 AM PDT by MNDude (Once you remove "they would never" from your Trump shared a post on soci it all begins to make sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

You must not be a true Christian? Because true Christians trust God AND have peace beyond all understanding.
They already know they will be tormented in the end times as evil runs rampant. But they trust God. They aren’t easy to scare.


12 posted on 07/20/2023 11:06:48 AM PDT by PrairieLady2 (USA: Land of the free, Because of the Brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MNDude
Love this "news" article that definitely does not belong in the opinion section. /sarc

Note that nowhere in the article do they speak to the fact that the United States is one of the biggest consumers of trafficked children and that those children come through our porous border. Author tries really, really hard to link the movie with QAnon, but provides no examples from the movie, and fails to note that no one had heard of QAnon when the movie was made years ago. Pathetic what passes for journalism today.

13 posted on 07/20/2023 11:06:56 AM PDT by GOP_Party_Animal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

You must not be a true Christian? Because true Christians trust God AND have peace beyond all understanding.
They already know they will be tormented in the end times as evil runs rampant. But they trust God. They aren’t easy to scare.


14 posted on 07/20/2023 11:09:20 AM PDT by PrairieLady2 (USA: Land of the free, Because of the Brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
Trump has a legitimate interest in the topic, unlike the Democrats.

Did he actually champion the issue while President, or was that just Q claiming he was?

Any executive orders?

Any comments at all on Epstein? He supposedly died under Trump’s watch. All I saw him say about any of it was his quote on Ghislane Maxwell of “I wish her well.”

15 posted on 07/20/2023 11:11:04 AM PDT by Golden Eagle (Ultra Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

“evangelicals” and “fear” don’t really go together. We ain’t skeered.


16 posted on 07/20/2023 11:11:47 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
Did he actually champion the issue while President

Yes, I believe he wanted to shut the border to reduce this

17 posted on 07/20/2023 11:14:48 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Specifically, this issue, what did he do?

We know Epstein died (supposedly) under his watch, which prevented it from ever going to trial, and all the accomplices being exposed. Did Trump even comment? I’m know he wished Ghislane well.

I’m just not seeing much positive here.


18 posted on 07/20/2023 11:23:08 AM PDT by Golden Eagle (Ultra Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
"Did he actually champion the issue while President, or was that just Q claiming he was?"

"Any executive orders?"

~~~~~~~

Yes he did champion the issue, and yes there were executive orders.
(Why do I suspect that you already knew this?)

~Easy

19 posted on 07/20/2023 11:25:51 AM PDT by EasySt (Say not this is the truth, but so it seems to me to be, as I see this thing I think I see. #MAGA-AaA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act (Public Law 114-328) (the “Act”), section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)) (INA), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code,

I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, find that the prevalence and severity of human rights abuse and corruption that have their source, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States, such as those committed or directed by persons listed in the Annex to this order, have reached such scope and gravity that they threaten the stability of international political and economic systems. Human rights abuse and corruption undermine the values that form an essential foundation of stable, secure, and functioning societies; have devastating impacts on individuals; weaken democratic institutions; degrade the rule of law; perpetuate violent conflicts; facilitate the activities of dangerous persons; and undermine economic markets. The United States seeks to impose tangible and significant consequences on those who commit serious human rights abuse or engage in corruption, as well as to protect the financial system of the United States from abuse by these same persons.

I therefore determine that serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States, and I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with that threat.

I hereby determine and order:

Section 1. (a) All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in:

(i) the persons listed in the Annex to this order;

(ii) any foreign person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General:

(A) to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have directly or indirectly engaged in, serious human rights abuse;

(B) to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in:

(1) corruption, including the misappropriation of state assets, the expropriation of private assets for personal gain, corruption related to government contracts or the extraction of natural resources, or bribery; or

(2) the transfer or the facilitation of the transfer of the proceeds of corruption;

(C) to be or have been a leader or official of:

(1) an entity, including any government entity, that has engaged in, or whose members have engaged in, any of the activities described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section relating to the leader’s or official’s tenure; or

(2) an entity whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order as a result of activities related to the leader’s or official’s tenure; or

(D) to have attempted to engage in any of the activities described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section; and

(iii) any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General:

(A) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of:

(1) any activity described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section that is conducted by a foreign person;

(2) any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or

(3) any entity, including any government entity, that has engaged in, or whose members have engaged in, any of the activities described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section, where the activity is conducted by a foreign person;

(B) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or

(C) to have attempted to engage in any of the activities described in subsections (iii)(A) or (B) of this section.

(b) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section apply except to the extent provided by statutes, or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted before the effective date of this order.

Sec. 2. The unrestricted immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of aliens determined to meet one or more of the criteria in section 1 of this order would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and the entry of such persons into the United States, as immigrants or nonimmigrants, is hereby suspended. Such persons shall be treated as persons covered by section 1 of Proclamation 8693 of July 24, 2011 (Suspension of Entry of Aliens Subject to United Nations Security Council Travel Bans and International Emergency Economic Powers Act Sanctions).

Sec. 3. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the types of articles specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order would seriously impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in this order, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by section 1 of this order.

Sec. 4. The prohibitions in section 1 include:

(a) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; and

(b) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.

Sec. 5. (a) Any transaction that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

(b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

Sec. 6. For the purposes of this order:

(a) the term “person” means an individual or entity;

(b) the term “entity” means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization; and

(c) the term “United States person” means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States.

Sec. 7. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this order would render those measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in this order, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to this order.

Sec. 8. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to take such actions, including adopting rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to me by IEEPA and the Act as may be necessary to implement this order and section 1263(a) of the Act with respect to the determinations provided for therein. The Secretary of the Treasury may, consistent with applicable law, redelegate any of these functions to other officers and agencies of the United States. All agencies shall take all appropriate measures within their authority to implement this order.

Sec. 9. The Secretary of State is hereby authorized to take such actions, including adopting rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to me by IEEPA, the INA, and the Act as may be necessary to carry out section 2 of this order and, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, the reporting requirement in section 1264(a) of the Act with respect to the reports provided for in section 1264(b)(2) of that Act. The Secretary of State may, consistent with applicable law, redelegate any of these functions to other officers and agencies of the United States consistent with applicable law.

Sec. 10. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General, is hereby authorized to determine that circumstances no longer warrant the blocking of the property and interests in property of a person listed in the Annex to this order, and to take necessary action to give effect to that determination.

Sec. 11. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to submit recurring and final reports to the Congress on the national emergency declared in this order, consistent with section 401(c) of the NEA (50 U.S.C. 1641(c)) and section 204(c) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1703(c)).

Sec. 12. This order is effective at 12:01 a.m., Eastern Standard Time, December 21, 2017.

Sec. 13. This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.


20 posted on 07/20/2023 11:38:47 AM PDT by MNDude (Once you remove "they would never" from your Trump shared a post on soci it all begins to make sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson