Posted on 07/23/2023 6:59:47 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
You would think that amidst countless disagreements between the Left and the Right, one vital area might see agreement: the welfare of children. You also would think that both sides would concur that luring children, grabbing them off the street, or snatching them at the border by those who sell them into sexual slavery, is truly abominable. Alas, you’d be wrong.
A movie, The Sound of Freedom, making the rounds in America should not be political in any way. It is, after all, about a worldwide phenomenon that is despicable beyond words. If ever evil existed in the world, it is amply displayed by those who exploit children and ruin their lives for their own gains.
Curiously, read reviews or critiques from The Washington Post, The Guardian, or numerous other media outlets. You will see that these media sources are inexplicably gleeful in picking apart the movie. The Washington Post wants to know why lead cast member Jim Caviezel visits conspiracy-focused websites. Caviezel is, of course, merely an actor. Whatever he believes and whatever web sources he visits are inconsequential to the real-life situation depicted in The Sound of Freedom.
Tom Cruise and John Travolta are well-known advocates of the Church of Scientology. Does WaPo dwell on that in reviewing their movies? Mel Gibson, Clint Eastwood, Jon Voight, and Mark Wahlberg are unabashed Conservatives. Adam Sandler, Gary Sinise, Denzel Washington, and Kurt Russell are all known to lean Right. Morgan Freeman has repeatedly made “unwoke” statements about society and race. Generally speaking, none of this filters into critiques of their movies.
The plight of millions of children worldwide cannot be underscored. Huge numbers have been extracted from their families throughout Latin and South America, but the problem exists as well on other continents. Nonetheless, The Washington Post deliberately delves into the personal backgrounds of actors in seeking to demean the importance of the movie.
Who among executive editors at The Washington Post can attack while ignoring the vital, documented message that this movie imparts? While some embellishment happens in all movies, this horrendous worldwide phenomenon is and should upset the sensibilities of any responsible adult on the planet. As the box office takes streams past $100,000,000, WaPo seeks to chip away at the authenticity of the story and the solid and fruitful impact that it’s having on the nation.
In London, The Guardian has employed words such as paranoid, as in a “paranoid” look at this worldwide phenomenon. Who in their editorial department chose that phrase? In good consciousness, how can they opt to diminish the impact of the movie and dismiss the magnitude of this worldwide problem?
What drives these media gatekeepers to intentionally overlook the horror of six-year-olds being whisked away into a life that is beyond Hell, where they are abused by gross men, and sometimes women, as often as five to ten times a day, for ten years or more? No words suffice to describe this monumental sin of humankind.
More children have been abducted into sexual slavery today than the total number of slaves who existed when it was legal in the United States, Great Britain, and other parts of the world.
Do the media gatekeepers object to religious overtones in the movie? Protagonist Tim Ballard states, "God's children are not for sale.” If you don't believe in God, you can still conclude that children should not be for sale. Yes, some characters in the film wear religious crosses. Is that grounds to demean this film?
Some media sources have called Tim Ballard a “white savior” to children of color. Who the heck cares as long as some children are being saved? Would it matter if the hero was black, brown, red, or yellow? How petty and ignorant can one be? Displaying contempt for white male heroes as the global market for the bodies and souls of innocent children expands is beyond rationality. Can such editorial gatekeepers look at themselves in the mirror and say, “I did a good job?” I seriously doubt it.
Evil people have no problem with it.
could be a long wait. but there will be hell to pay
I draw cartoons as a hobby. I worked at a major company. My manager decided to have me terminated by sending some of my cartoons to HR. I got terminated. I protested and said that my cartoons were virtuous. Long story short - I said that everyone agrees that sex-trafficking of pre-teen girls is wrong. The HR rep said that that was just my opinion. I answered back, “Are you saying that there are people here who think that sex-trafficking of 11-year-olds is OK?” He answered yes. News to me.
This is the reason Joe Shitbaqg Biden wants an open border. Democrats, all of them, every one of them, are perverts, pedophiles, groomers, drug addicts, pimps, or pushers.
In their eyes, good is what they do to others, bad is what is done to them
Nope.
You are looking at it through an American, middle class, hetro-normitive, cis-gendered lens.
According to the great Alfred Kinsey-P who got his data from paying criminals to rape small children and infants, children are sexual from birth.
Adults having forced sex with small children is great and even healthy for the children. Children also love being beaten, having bones broken and being roasted for dinner.
What the hell is wrong with this country that we haven't ended this already!!!
Trump put in place a policy that minors coming into this country to stay with a relative (according to their wrist band) that the relative had to come pick up the child and both had genetic testing to make sure they were related. Way less kids stopped showing up.
Biden stopped this!!!
Now we just send the kids on tax payers dollars to who ever is on their wrist bands.
I'm calling my US rep., David Trone, to raise hell. We all should be making phone calls!!!
150 years ago the Party of Hate and Evil, the Democrat Party, openly advocated selling children away from their parents. Nothing has changed.
The only and I do mean the only way anyone on the left would say Child Trafficking is Wrong and Evil is if Donald Trump was implicated.
I suspect the same could be said of the Uni-Party members of congress.
that’s when you go higher then HR and use the words created liability in describing. the interaction. if you live in a one-party consent state record the conversation.
Saw the movie today. Very powerful.
To many Democrats, children are just targets of their political/sexual “Hunger Games”.
The leaders of their cult including the media are rabid pedophiles.
The “Guardian” is defending its home county’s practice of buggering.
Maybe because child trafficking involves homosexuality in up to 50% of those sexually used the left must protect its core constitutes favorite past time. Planned parenthood is in the baby parts and stem cell business.
Since the left are Marxists who denounce God there is rule without God’s Commandments to prevent their animalistic. The left are not a civilized people but rather savages who enjoy their power in hurting or killing decent people.
That was disappointing.
I can understand if they didn't want to review it because the subject is too serious. But to just dismiss it entirely and repeat what the media is calling it is unlike them.
A list of these people to be dealt with if the civil breakdown comes.
RE: dismissing it as some “Q-anon movie” that no one is really going to see.
Yep, no one is going to see the movie which just made nearly TEN TIMES its budget in the box office beating out the likes of such famous franchises as Indiana Jones and even Mission Impossible.
I saw “The Sound of Freedom” this afternoon, and I highly recommend it. Besides addressing the issue of juvenile white slavery, one of the great evils of our day it’s an old-fashioned thriller with some exciting shoot-’em-up scenes and no sex or nudity.
Here is the thing. I learned about child porn, NAMBLA, child sex trafficing (aka white slavery) and the perverts who were pushing to normalize all of this back in the 80s. (Remember "Sex before Eight or Else It's Too Late"?) Some of it I learned from obscure little publications like Reader's Digest. Others from books in the public library.
This. Was. Known.
And honestly no one seemed to care.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.