Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Dangerous Is Nuclear Waste?
PragerU ^ | July 24, 2023 | James Meigs

Posted on 07/24/2023 5:52:58 AM PDT by Twotone

Even environmentalists concede that nuclear power is a clean source of abundant, reliable energy. But they stop short of supporting it. Why? Because of the “waste problem.” But how real are their concerns? James Meigs, senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, answers this question.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nuclearwaste; prageru
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
Excellent five minute video on the topic.
1 posted on 07/24/2023 5:52:58 AM PDT by Twotone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Twotone

Thorium pebble bed reactors will be key in getting more nuclear plants built. Yes, there is waste but nowhere near as problematic as uranium fueled reactors.


2 posted on 07/24/2023 6:00:42 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Perhaps we should be less concerned with who we might offend and more concerned with who we inspire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

Weren’t fast breeder reactors almost waste free?


3 posted on 07/24/2023 6:04:22 AM PDT by mountainlion (Live well those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

Deep State is of far more immediate danger to us.

On a daily basis.


4 posted on 07/24/2023 6:07:54 AM PDT by mewzilla (We will never restore the republic if we don't first secure the ballot box.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla; Twotone
Deep State is of far more immediate danger to us

That's right! How dare you talk about anything besides what mewzilla wants to talk about. He knows that all we have to do is pay more attention to the news he wants us to monitor, then, poof, the Deep State disappears.

5 posted on 07/24/2023 6:17:18 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

Sure, radioactive waste used improperly can be dangerous. Electricity is dangerous; always has been, but if used properly is a great boon to mankind. The really BAD ideas in the field of energy seem to be part & parcel of the Obama & Biden administrations. This part of the American political scene needs to be permanently erased as we can do better.


6 posted on 07/24/2023 6:18:33 AM PDT by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

Is the waste actually nuclear or merely called nuclear?


7 posted on 07/24/2023 6:24:26 AM PDT by bert ( (KWE. NP. N.C. +12) Joe Biden is a kleptocrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

I agree. We should be the world leaders in this by now. We should have pebble bed reactors at municipal level already. The technology doesn’t seem insurmountable to me.


8 posted on 07/24/2023 6:25:28 AM PDT by rlmorel ("If you think tough men are dangerous, just wait until you see what weak men are capable of." JBP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

The big issue is the used fuel rods. Ideally, they should by recycled into new fuel rods, burning up the radioactive isotopes in the reactor.

Jimmy Carter issued an Executive Order in 1977 prohibiting the recycling of spent fuel rods, thus creating the problem of what to do with old fuel rods.

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/reaction/readings/rossin.html#:~:text=THE%20CARTER%20POLICY,of%20spent%20nuclear%20reactor%20fuel.


9 posted on 07/24/2023 6:31:33 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor (The rot of all principle begins with a single compromise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

The late David Brenner had the best idea for disposing of nuclear waste: Gift wrap it, and leave it sitting in the back seat of a car parked in the parking lot at Newark Airport.


10 posted on 07/24/2023 6:36:19 AM PDT by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

Store the nuclear waste on the same site it’s generated at. There’s a company that specializes in doing that. It’s earthquake-proof and wouldn’t require HAZMAT transport away.


11 posted on 07/24/2023 6:44:18 AM PDT by MinstrelBoy (If you're a conservative today, you're a hero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion

“Weren’t fast breeder reactors almost waste free?”

No, using U238 in a reactor produces Pu239 which can be used in a reactor or a bomb. The decay of Pu239 is not waste free.


12 posted on 07/24/2023 6:47:09 AM PDT by bosco24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

I’ve read that all of the nuclear waste generated in the US can fit inside of a football field.


13 posted on 07/24/2023 6:50:24 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bosco24

“No, using U238 in a reactor produces Pu239 which can be used in a reactor or a bomb. The decay of Pu239 is not waste free.”

So, use it in reactors...it’s called “fuel”. Thorium molten salt reactors handle it quite nicely, reducing “waste” storage time to 300 years or so. I prefer molten salt to pebble bed reactors for many reasons.

A company in Copenhagen (Denmark) is gearing up to do small modular thorium molten salt reactors:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27IntvWo4mo&t=608s


14 posted on 07/24/2023 7:19:06 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (NRA Life Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

Yucca mountain was the answer. Too many existing waste sites out there. Consolidate them.


15 posted on 07/24/2023 8:07:24 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (e allowed )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

Plus, some of those non-pebble bed Thorium designs can ‘burn’ some of the U waste.


16 posted on 07/24/2023 8:13:25 AM PDT by curious7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

Agreed. The “problems” of Yucca Mt. are political, not technical.


17 posted on 07/24/2023 8:21:07 AM PDT by oldplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

Yucca Mountain was a jobs program. There was no way they were ever going to store waste at that site. Classic Dem bait and switch. Dingy Harry supported it right up to the time it was ready and pulled the pin when his ECO supporters said it was time.


18 posted on 07/24/2023 8:24:16 AM PDT by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Or under the totally funded and completely empty vast Yucca Flats deep undermountain 100 year storage/burial facility. All prevented from use by... Harry ‘blackeye sports boy’ Reid. Late Senator .

In the middle of absolute nowhere desolate mtn. desert. Does require transport— with that risk.


19 posted on 07/24/2023 8:42:58 AM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MinstrelBoy
"Store the nuclear waste on the same site it’s generated at. There’s a company that specializes in doing that. It’s earthquake-proof and wouldn’t require HAZMAT transport away."

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ THIS ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

No civilization ever deprived itself into prosperity. If you can't conquer your way to riches (conquest ethos having fallen out of fashion) then the next-best way is to innovate your way to wealth.

In a Free-Market Economy (not to be confused with 'capitalist'), the quickest, cheapest way to a solution is to monetize it. There aren't many problems that can't be solved by liberal application of the profit motive.

20 posted on 07/24/2023 9:01:09 AM PDT by threefinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson