Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: Red Badger
Fox? The Paul Ryan Network? With friends like that, who needs enemies?
2 posted on
08/02/2023 9:29:14 AM PDT by
blackdog
((Z28.310) My dog Sam eats purple flowers.)
To: Red Badger
Jack Smith is another Soros Stooge
To: Red Badger
How about misappropriation of government resources, i.e., weaponization of the government with intent to cause financial ruin and smear a political enemy who is a frontrunner for POTUS once again???!!!
-rhetorical rant over-
4 posted on
08/02/2023 9:33:17 AM PDT by
logi_cal869
(-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
To: Red Badger
He ain’t stupid, he’s corrupt.
5 posted on
08/02/2023 9:33:56 AM PDT by
budj
(Combat vet, second of three generations.)
To: Red Badger
6 posted on
08/02/2023 9:34:53 AM PDT by
Magnum44
(...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
To: Red Badger
"Jack Smith as special counsel should be indicted for stupidity""Jack Smith as special counsel should be indicted for stupidity""Jack Smith as special counsel should be indicted for stupidity""Jack Smith as special counsel should be indicted for stupidity""Jack Smith as special counsel should be indicted for stupidity" So, what are you really saying?
7 posted on
08/02/2023 9:38:14 AM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(It's not a government. It's a criminal enterprise. Fear it, but do not respect it.)
To: Red Badger
He obviously failed Constitution 101.
Trump did not shout “fire” in a crowded theater.
Anything less egregious is First Amendment protected speech.
8 posted on
08/02/2023 9:38:45 AM PDT by
lightman
(I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
To: Red Badger
they dont care
they just need a willing judge and jury
easy enough in dc
9 posted on
08/02/2023 9:43:27 AM PDT by
joshua c
(to disrupt the system, we must disrupt our lives, cut the cable tv)
To: Red Badger
Just another example of democrats accusing the opposition of the very same thing they are guilty of.
10 posted on
08/02/2023 9:44:50 AM PDT by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> --- )
To: Red Badger
There should be a law that states “if it is proven that a prosecutor has put forth a frivolous indictment he/she should be disbarred. Further, if the frivolous indictment is put forth by a grand jury they, the grand jury, should be charged with false arrest!”
11 posted on
08/02/2023 9:51:08 AM PDT by
eeriegeno
(Checks and balances??? What checks and balances?)
To: Red Badger
Better yet, SCOTUS should eliminate prosecutorial immunity. The immunity for government legal officials is destroying the nation.
13 posted on
08/02/2023 10:04:32 AM PDT by
grumpygresh
(Civil disobedience by non-compliance; jury and state nullification. )
To: Red Badger
Why doesn’t Trump file frivolous suit/color of law type suits?
14 posted on
08/02/2023 10:18:05 AM PDT by
fruser1
To: Red Badger
jack Smith is far from stupid. His task is to block Trump and he is doing everything he can, legal and illegal to do that.
To: Red Badger
They are trying to force the SC to get involved so that they can pack it. That is what all these frivolous, unconstitutional prosecutions are about.
To: Red Badger
Until the era of Barack Obama and Eric Holder, the efforts of the community activists were to excuse and absolve the transparently guilty. It was only when Barack Obama and Eric Holder moved into office that things changed; the inflection point was achieved.
What we now consider the weaponization of the DOJ is actually the outcome of Main Justice merging with community activism. Instead of the long-standing method of absolving the transparently guilty, the justice system was repurposed to accuse the transparently innocent.
Only one voice noticed the changed activity as it was taking place and called my attention to it, that voice was author Jack Cashill.
From the Henry Louis Gates (beer summit) in the White House, which targeted Sgt James Crowley, to the accusations against George Zimmerman (Orlando), Darren Wilson (Ferguson), the Baltimore Six accusations, and all the way through to Donald Trump, Michael Flynn et al, there is one continuum of the same justice system ideological effort – to accuse the transparently innocent. To weaponize the systems of power toward a unified objective.
In the early stages of 2009 to 2012, the media were probed and prodded, tested to identify their willful alignment and train them to assist. In essence, the goal was to bring the corporate media into the new shifted dynamic of targeting. The media no longer needed to justify the actions of the transparently guilty offenders. The new goal was to frame the transparently innocent with accusations that advanced the interests of the regime.
People have noted the shift and realignment in Democrats. This is all connected to this same shifted dynamic. The activists gained control of the levers of power. The force of government now shifted the media narrative from bad behavior (targeting the guilty the activist supported) to good behavior (targeting the behavior of innocents the activists do not support).
While this media effort was taking place, Attorney General Eric Holder was transforming the DOJ into an ideological targeting enterprise. Eventually, leading to what is visible now with a fully weaponized Main Justice and FBI system. The FBI now protecting the interests of those who weaponize – those who are corrupt.
The 2011/2012 Tea Party targeting did not originate in the IRS; it began with Eric Holder triggering a “special research project” requesting CD ROM’s containing the names, organizations and entities listed on the Schedule-B’s of the various Tea Party group tax filings. The IRS, via Lois Lerner, was eventually identified in this project by a whistleblower from the Cincinatti office, but it was Attorney General Eric Holder at the DOJ who initiated the entire operation.
The NSA database then became a tool with similar “special research” intent, and that process followed through the 2016 GOP presidential primary to the position it is today. The infiltration of Social Media platforms for this same type of targeting operation is another step in the continuum to notice.
If you step back from the granular details and look at the entire landscape, you can trace this origin to the inflection point where community activism merged with government. That merge to generate a weaponized DOJ is entirely the result of President Obama’s 2008 election.
There are current voices who notice the Obama operative fingerprints still controlling the mechanisms today; examples like Lisa Monaco as Deputy AG at the Dept of Justice, as well as many more Obama administration officials still in positions of power and direct influence. Special Counsel Jack Smith and his targeting operation against Donald Trump is simply another example of this extended operation.
All of these participants have some level of stakeholder investment in retaining this weaponized system. Every tool at their disposal will be used in the retention.
Moving forward to destroy the corruption means we must first accept the origin.
Understanding the toxic outcome of the Obama origin, a fully weaponized American government, is akin to having a discussion about vaccine danger with those who already took the vaccine. Few will want to accept the conversation!
… After all, it is easier to accept the results of a fraudulent election, than for them to admit their complicity in the demise of our nation.
17 posted on
08/02/2023 10:25:04 AM PDT by
Bratch
To: Red Badger
Smith’s goal is to stop Trump from being President again. It has nothing to do with justice. When this is over Jack Smith needs to be dealt with so that he can never harm any American again. I can think of only one way to permanently achieve that.
19 posted on
08/02/2023 10:27:15 AM PDT by
ConservativeInPA
(The Delay Trump’s trial, delay. Elect Trump President. Trump pardons himself. )
To: Red Badger
He's got a Trump-hating judge and can easily pick a Trump-hating jury:
eg.:
(white or black?)
(male or female?)
(single or married?) (All done. Easy-peasy)
22 posted on
08/02/2023 10:36:04 AM PDT by
EliRoom8
To: Red Badger
So Jack thinks it’s illegal to not accept election results? What a moron. Millions of us are violating his phony law. Hillary too.
To: Red Badger
From a legal perspective Gregg Jarrett may very well be right. But convicting Trump, is not the primary purpose of these indictments.
Call it a political death by a thousand cuts:
Make him spend money on his legal defense.
Dominate the airwaves with negative Trump publicity.
Keep Trump focused on his legal issues.
Influence middle of the road voters
Conviction probability: very high, (it is DC)
Assure a Democrat is elected
Thrown out on appeal probability: Extremely High
2025-26 -- US Attorney General Smith
Mission accomplished
24 posted on
08/02/2023 10:38:39 AM PDT by
Michael.SF.
( Biden-Fetterman in ‘24: It's a no brainer)
To: Red Badger
Is “Jack Smith” his real name?
Whatever his name is, he is a corrupt bozo!!
25 posted on
08/02/2023 10:47:34 AM PDT by
Honorary Serb
(Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson