Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Democrats press Roberts on Alito recusals
thehill.com ^ | August 4, 2023 | ELLA LEE

Posted on 08/05/2023 12:36:16 PM PDT by lowbridge

Ten Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee, led by chairman Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), implored Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts in a letter Thursday to ensure Justice Samuel Alito will recuse himself from future cases pertaining to legislation regulating the high court.

The senators’ request hinged on an interview Alito gave to the Wall Street Journal last week, where he opined that the U.S. Constitution does not give Congress the authority to regulate the Court, “period.”

“Congress did not create the Supreme Court,” Alito said of efforts to legislate ethics regulations. “I know this is a controversial view, but I’m willing to say it.”

The Democratic senators — all of the Judiciary Committee’s majority members except Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.) — rebuffed Alito’s perspective as “plainly incorrect” and raised concern that he “publicly prejudged” the issues, which could land before the Court.

They referred back to testimony Alito gave during his 2006 confirmation hearing, where he said he “wouldn’t want to prejudge any constitutional question that might be presented to me.”

“And yet, we now have Justice Alito publicly remarking on the constitutionality of pending legislation — comments that unquestionably engender doubt that he could fairly discharge his duties should this question come before the Court,” the senators wrote.

The request for Roberts to take “appropriate steps” to ensure Alito recuses himself on any cases related to Court regulation comes amid increased scrutiny of the Supreme Court justices’ ethics.

“Since 2011, you have argued that the Supreme Court can police its own ethical conduct,” the senators wrote to Roberts. “Yet, this year has been marked by revelation after revelation of justices receiving lavish gifts that they failed to disclose as required by law or otherwise using their offices and taxpayer-funded resources for personal gain.”

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: alison; roberts; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: lowbridge

To hell with them. No recusals until the Jamaican and Non-Native American Indian are recused from being Stalin and Lenin heroes by JSixing an American president. They shouldn’t even be allowed to be “judges”. Did we run out of friggin’ Americans or something?


21 posted on 08/05/2023 2:11:50 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer ("There's no cryin' in baseball and there's no ethics in politics!" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
Democrats believe they are the government. Regardless, they are totally out of control at this point.
22 posted on 08/05/2023 2:14:21 PM PDT by Major Matt Mason (To solve the Democrat problem, the RINO problem must first be solved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Perhaps these wizards of smart who signed the letter could share with the class the Article and Section of the Constitution that gives Congress the authority to regulate the Supreme Court.


23 posted on 08/05/2023 2:22:50 PM PDT by ALPAPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

This is as likely to go nowhere as when conservative senators asked Roberts to force recusal over Kagan hearing cases that were actually disputed by her when she was Solicitor General under Obama.

She actually wrote briefs that she later got to rule on.

Alito just expressed his thinking on how he sees the Constitution that they don’t like. You know, like first amendment freedom of speech...

Give me an f’n break!


24 posted on 08/05/2023 2:50:51 PM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Repeal the Patriot Act; Abolish the DHS; reform FBI top to bottom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

The Hill has become The Village Voice.


25 posted on 08/05/2023 3:43:49 PM PDT by Ge0ffrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

3 Branches of Federal GOVERNMENT

Meant to be separate & distinctive.

Durbin & his Horse hocky pals are wrong. THEY are out of line.


26 posted on 08/05/2023 4:01:33 PM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skr

IF they DO-—THEY ARE DOING A PISS POOR JOB OF IT.


27 posted on 08/05/2023 4:02:36 PM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: falcon99

I wouldn’t trust Kagan to read HOA rules correctly.


28 posted on 08/05/2023 4:03:41 PM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Alito to Democrats: GFYS.


29 posted on 08/05/2023 4:22:14 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (Every Goliath has his David. Child in need of a CGM system. https://gofund.me/6452dbf1. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Make any rulings by the lesbians and one pedifile at SCOTUS null and void on gender cases.


30 posted on 08/30/2023 10:06:20 AM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson