Posted on 08/10/2023 1:03:35 PM PDT by Red Badger
Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis is expected to seek more than a dozen indictments when she presents her case regarding efforts by Donald Trump and his allies to overturn the 2020 presidential election results in Georgia before a grand jury next week, sources familiar with the matter told CNN.
Willis, a Democrat, has been eyeing conspiracy and racketeering charges, which would allow her to bring a case against multiple defendants. Her wide-ranging criminal probe focuses on efforts to pressure election officials, the plot to put forward fake electors and a voting systems breach in rural Coffee County, Georgia.
Trump acolytes who took part in each of those schemes believe they will face charges in Georgia next week, people familiar with their thinking said. Trump also believes he will be charged in the case, CNN has reported.
Willis’ office declined to comment.
The witnesses Willis has subpoenaed when she presents her case include former Republican Lt. Gov. Geoff Duncan, former Georgia Democratic state Sen. Jen Jordan and independent journalist George Chidi. All of them previously testified before a special purpose grand jury that was tasked with investigating the Trump case and heard from more than 75 witnesses.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
Corrupt weaponized American justice on display
12 more charges will bring it to a nice 90! Someone is bound to find 10 more charges somewhere to round it out to 100.
Why not 3 dozen? They’re all fake anyway
Criminal Libtards
'The public has NO right to see public records that they paid for!!!!'
Not 12 for Trump alone, 12 Republicans.
She going after the whole party....................
They know the Republicans will continue to sit on their a**es as usual.
in order to show conspiracy and racketeering, we need more than just Trump.
Someone else had 12 co-conspirators with Him when they went after Him... hmmmmm
and with the Bidens, the same commie media repeats the line “No evidence of corruption” America is done, she had a nice run..but the left has too much power in this country to do whatever they damn well please and get away with it
“She going after the whole party.....”
It’s always darkest before the dawn.............
If I wanted the end the presidential campaign for Chris Christie, all I have to do is find some felony he committed, like sitting on his cat. I hope the U.S. Supreme Court puts an end to this end-run around the election system.
Disappointing - was hoping they would pile more charges on - but going after the whole party before the Dems sweep 2024 does not look good for anyone who votes GOP - that’s the pre-election message.
Guess they really do want to bring the country down in actual flames and, if they have to die for their Cause, then its OK, because the US will never recover. Mission accomplished.
Because obviously Republicans are master criminals. Not
Seems like this is one way to get a lazyass judge to hear the actual evidence of crooked elections. Discovery most likely will produce a schadenfroidybitch of a pile of sleazy election work?
Willis’ wide-ranging criminal probe focuses on Republican efforts
to pressure election officials, via the plot to put forward fake electors.
Hah.....Trump has an even stronger case on fake electors organized by Democrats. Read on.
pic-—Democratic presidential electors revolt against Trump
11_donald_trump_2_ap_1160.jpg
pic-—Some presidential electors are lobbying their counterparts in other states to reject their oaths to vote against Donald Trump when the Electoral College meets on Dec. 19. | AP Photo
SOURCE.... Politico, By KYLE CHENEY, 11/22/2016 05:09 AM EST
At least a half-dozen Democratic electors have signed onto an attempt to block Donald Trump from winning an Electoral College majority, an effort designed not only to deny Trump the presidency but also to undermine the legitimacy of the institution.
The presidential electors, mostly former Bernie Sanders supporters who hail from Washington state and Colorado, are now lobbying their Republican counterparts in other states to reject their oaths — and in some cases, state law — to vote against Trump when the Electoral College meets on Dec. 19.
Even the most optimistic among the Democratic electors acknowledges they’re unlikely to persuade the necessary 37 Republican electors to reject Trump — the number they’d likely need to deny him the presidency and send the final decision to the House of Representatives. And even if they do, the Republican-run House might simply elect Trump anyway.
But the Democratic electors are convinced that even in defeat, their efforts would erode confidence in the Electoral College and fuel efforts to eliminate it, ending the body’s 228-year run as the only official constitutional process for electing the president. With that goal in mind, the group is also contemplating encouraging Democratic electors to oppose Hillary Clinton and partner with Republicans in support of a consensus pick like Mitt Romney or John Kasich.
The underlying idea is that a mass defection of electors could provide the impetus for a wave of changes to the Electoral College.
“I do think that a byproduct would be a serious look into Electoral College reform,” said Micheal Baca, a Democratic elector from Colorado who is spearheading the anti-Trump effort, along with Washington state elector P. Bret Chiafalo.
“If it gets into the House, the controversy and the uncertainty that would immediately blow up into a political firestorm in the U.S. would cause enough people — my hope is — to look at the whole concept of the Electoral College,” said another elector involved in the anti-Trump planning, who declined to be identified.
One prominent Electoral College critic says that even if Trump wins easily on Dec. 19, a small number of Republican defections could still roil the future of the institution.
“If you could get eight or 10 Trump electors to vote for someone else ... then that would probably get people’s attention,” said George Edwards III, a political science professor and Electoral College expert at Texas A&M University. “We haven’t ever had that many faithless electors in one election.”
Democratic elector Polly Baca (no relation to Micheal) said the Electoral College should be returned to its original conception — as laid outby Alexander Hamilton in the Federalist Papers — as a deliberative body able to exercise free choice while using popular votes only as a guide.
“If we cannot use the Electoral College as a deliberative process ... then we ought to do away with it,” said Baca, a former co-chairman of the Democratic National Convention and former Colorado state senator.
The 538 members who comprise the Electoral College are slated to gather in their respective state capitals on Dec. 19 to cast the formal vote for president. Trump won the popular vote in states making up 290 electoral votes — and he’s leading narrowly in Michigan, which carries another 16 electoral votes. If all of them vote for Trump, he’ll win 306 electoral votes, easily exceeding the 270-vote majority he needs to become president. That’s why the magic number is 37 Republican defections.
Dozens of Republican electors, picked at state and local party conventions, have signaled discomfort with Trump, but most have committed to supporting him despite their misgivings. Only a handful have said they’d consider voting against him in the Electoral College.
One, Texas’ Art Sisneros, said he’s still making up his mind. South Dakota Gov. Dennis Daugaard, another elector,called on Trump to withdraw from the race after a tape of his comments about sexually assaulting women leaked in October. But he’s since confirmed he’d still support Trump with his electoral vote.
A slew of Democrats, on the other hand, have also signaled they may defect from Clinton, which wouldn’t help or hinder Trump’s path to the White House but could contribute to a sense of disarray and voter disenfranchisement.
In any case, it’s hard to know exactly how many faithless electors may be out there because there’s no organized effort by candidates or parties to whip votes or track support.
Polly Baca, who’s still considering whether to cast her vote against Clinton, said that she’ll decide in part based on whether there’s a strategic consensus reached with other Democrats to vote for another candidate.
Already, the six Democrats prepared to be “faithless” electors would be the most to defect from their party’s presidential candidate since 1872, when Democratic nominee Horace Greeley died before electors cast their votes. The last time that many electors rejected a living presidential candidate was 1808.
Robert Nemanich, another Colorado elector prepared to cast a faithless vote, said he’s spoken to five electors in his state alone who intend to join him.
The rarity of the faithless elector phenomenon is rooted in electors’ reluctance to reject the will of the voters. But it’s also because 29 states — including Colorado and Washington — have laws mandating that electors support the winner of the state popular vote.
These laws, though, have never been enforced or challenged. And some of them impose only modest fines but provide no recourse to change the outcome.
Trump transition beats the press
Politico, BY HADAS GOLD | NOVEMBER 21, 2016 03:21 PM
In recent elections, the Electoral College has become an increasingly vexing issue for Democrats, who won the popular vote in 2000, only to see George W. Bush take the White House because of the electoral vote math. Should the college vote for Trump, as expected, it’ll be the same story: Clinton led the popular vote by about 1.7 million votes as of Monday morning.
To repeal the Electoral College outright would require a constitutional amendment — and Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) conveniently proposed one last week. But it’s unlikely to advance in a Republican-controlled Congress.
Another measure, a multistate compact already enacted in 11 states, would require electors to support the winner of the national popular vote. But that would take effect only if enough states join to comprise a majority of the Electoral College.
So far, the 11 signatory states — all solidly Democratic — make up just 165 electoral votes.
Ironically, Democrats have taken heart from Trump’s own statements regarding the Electoral College. In the past, the president-elect has called the body a “disaster for democracy.”
In 2012, he urged supporters to march on Washington when he believed Mitt Romney had won the popular vote but lost the Electoral College.
His views haven’t changed. In a recent,post-election interview with “60 Minutes,” he said, “I would rather see it where you went with simple votes.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.