When you hire attorneys to defend you in a court of law, it's usually a good idea to listen to them - that's why they're there.I would have thought his lawyers would be part of this exonerating report but I guess not.
We have Anti-Trumpers lurking here first thing in the AM. It’s like the alcoholic needing a drink, they can’t help themselves. As soon as they get out of bed they can’t wait to bash the man.
Trump now has standing. I can’t see how a judge will disallow this in court.
The following proves that he believed strongly that the election was rigged.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4175815/posts
I agree, it is better to have the attorneys present this as a court filing.
“When you hire attorneys to defend you in a court of law, it’s usually a good idea to listen to them-”
Ummm, I think he has experience in this area. Attorneys tend to be totally submissive to even tyrannical rogue biased judges, which most in Trump’s cases are.
“usually” should should be a more qualified ‘usually”.
Those rules don't apply to a kangaroo court and a political which hunt trial.