RNC releases criteria for second GOP debate [pretty important information]

the hill ^ | 8/2/23 | Caroline Vakil

[catnipman]

RNC this week released eligibility criteria for presidential candidates to make the second GOP debate.

Candidates ... will need to have a minimum of 50,000 unique donors, including 200 donors in 20 states or more each ...

Candidates will also need to register at a minimum of 3 percent in two national polls or poll at 3 percent in one national poll and 3 percent in two polls conducted in two early states, which include Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada ...

[catnipman]

should eliminate a lot of the riff-raff, leaving only the slightly taller midgets to snipe at each other ...

[Dilbert San Diego]

Yes these criteria will narrow the field.

[joe fonebone]

Hopefully that traitorous pence is out...

[McGavin999]

Will it state that you can’t pay diners to donate $1

[NWFree]

The 2nd Loser’s Debate because the first one wasn’t worthless enough

[CatOwner]

Is there anything in the criteria that specifies each qualified participant is required to spend at least a certain amount of time trashing Trump?

[twister881]

It’s “fringe outsider” candidates such as Larry Elder and Doug Burgum who move the debate and the party, which is exactly what the Country Club gop-E Deep State Uniparty Ruling Class don’t want. No names...Bush41, Turd Blossom, MILF Rotney, Cocaine Mitch.

[Georgia Girl 2]

What possible reason could there be to bring the never gonna bees back onstage. 🙄

[Reno89519]

Should be 5%

[Lumper20]

Agree. Pence is pure TRASH.

[eyeamok]

seems like a lot to ask for, considering this is for second place.

[ConservativeInPA]

Eventually the RNC will have one candidate talking to himself. Wouldn’t it be great if the to be debate was Trump and the sole remaining single digit midget, and Trump pulls out at the very last hour due to “having to consult his legal team about the witch hunt trials.” 😂

If you didn’t get my tone, I don’t give a damn about Ronna, the RNC and their debates. The RNC is what’s wrong with the Republican Party.

[Starboard]

“The RNC is what’s wrong with the Republican Party.”

************

Thank you for saying that.

RNC = Really Not Conservative

[Dilbert San Diego]

Well, there’s no guarantee that Trump’s running mate is going to be one of those candidates.

[VTenigma]

That’s in the fine print.

[Dilbert San Diego]

And yet, she won reelection as RNC chair overwhelmingly.

[9YearLurker]

At least two chairs taken from the Keebler elves before the music stops again.

[bboise]

RNC = REALLY NOT CONSERVATIVE, I like that, so perfectly descriptive

[ConservativeInPA]

And that indicates an even bigger problem in the RINO Party

[Jim Noble]

RNC releases criteria for second GOP debate [pretty important information]

Calling anything those idiots do "important information" is ridiculous.