P
We needed this ruling 3 years ago. At least we got it for next year’s completely unplanned and unexpected pandemic.
Why do we need a prescription to get ivermectin in pill form ?
I don’t think that has always been the case
Translation: “Naughty, FDA. Bad! Bad!”
Uh oh, NOW what? Will the AMA step up and threaten the medical license of anyone who prescribes it? They can’t let this stand!
but i thot the fda was my meemaw
Remember, the FDA and Fauci were in cahoots over this.
That’s an interesting line to take. Informing IS advising so I would think the FDA would have the right and power to advertise that “ivermectin shouldn’t be used for covid”- where I draw the line is that they had no right to block doctors from prescribing it for that reason (and maybe that’s the judge’s point in context... that they couldn’t “advise” doctors)
on a wider note - does this now apply to tobacco and marijuana usage? butter? meat?
Disease-X Is A High-Return Business Strategy
BY David BellDAVID BELL SEPTEMBER 2, 2023 PUBLIC HEALTH 7 MINUTE READ
Why not rely on existing threats?
Despite current efforts with yet another variant, Covid-19 is losing its ability to scare. Sustained fear is necessary for politicians in penetrated governments (as Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum notes) to provide this support. This business paradigm requires a continuing target.
The overall aim is for the public to think that only a corporate authoritarian (fascist) nanny-state can save them from a continuing threat. Major natural outbreaks being rare, and lab escapes also infrequent, Disease-X fills this need. It provides the material for the media and politicians to work with between variant or monkeypox events.
Where to from here?
For the public, diversion of resources to fairyland diseases will increase mortality by diverting funding for real threats and productive areas of investment. Of course, if increasing lab leaks of engineered pathogens are expected from ongoing and future research, that would be different. But then this would have to be explained plainly and transparently, and prevention may be more effective than a very expensive cure.
Disease-X is a business strategy, dependent on a series of fallacies, dressed up as an altruistic concern for human welfare. Embraced by powerful people, the world they move in accepts amoral practice in public health as a legitimate path to their version of success.
If our primary aim is to channel taxpayer funding to development of biotechnologies that the public can then be mandated to buy, to their own detriment but at great benefit to the developers, then Disease-X is the road forward. This market model ensures that a relative few can concentrate wealth gained from the many, at virtually no risk to themselves. The public must decide whether they want to keep their part of this highly abusive bargain.
Excerpted: https://brownstone.org/articles/disease-x-is-a-high-return-business-strategy/
Even if you assume pure motives, at best, the FDA’s purpose is to protect us from health freedom as if we were its children.
““FDA is not a physician. It has authority to inform, announce, and apprise—but not to endorse, denounce, or advise,” the ruling reads.”
The kill shot right there. The criminals in the FDA acted as medical doctors without license.
That is an interesting finding. You mean we should actually read the authorizing legislation to bound mission scope?
FDA: “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.” Aug 21, 2021
Does this mean the hospitals no longer get to mandate their Remdesivir/Ventilator money making death plan just because somebody tests COVID “positive”?
Took Ivermectin after I was exposed to Covid.
Had a day of fever and stuffy nose. Basically nothing.
We were lied to protect Big Pharma
BTTT