It's something to do with Democrat "ActBlue" donor program they're saying many of the folk are fictious and that it's an elaborate money laundering operation
Interesting......
James O’Keeffe uncovered some fraud by ActBlue a bit before his falling out with Project Veritas. They found there were regular income type Democrats that had donated a little to ActBlue but per ActBlues records had donated hundreds of thousands. The donars were shocked and confused when interviews asked them if they had donated those amounts.
Because she is persecuting Trump, it will be overlooked.
I heard something about that last year .. an then it just fell off the edge of the world.
Glad to see someone is blowing on that spark .. I think it could be a “something” .
Taking big buck donations and breaking them down into small donations under elderly and fictitious names .. real dirt
Yawn. Drop me a line when something happens to her. I’ll wait.
Soros is mentioned in the article and in many of the comments.
don’t underestimate what’s going on to steal ‘24.
2 Sept: PostMillennial: George Soros’ son shifts priorities, resources to focus on defeating MAGA in 2024
“I believe a MAGA-style Republican victory in next year’s U.S. presidential election could, in the end, be worse for the EU than for the U.S.”
by Libby Emmons
Alex Soros penned an op ed in in Politico about the George Soros-founded Open Society Foundations and the Soros mission. Part of that mission is preventing Donald Trump from serving another term in the White House.
“I believe a MAGA-style Republican victory in next year’s U.S. presidential election could, in the end, be worse for the EU than for the U.S. Such an outcome will imperil European unity and undermine the progress achieved on many fronts in response to the war in Ukraine,” Soros said...
Soros claims that he and the Foundation “Are shifting our priorities in Europe accordingly. Yes, this means we will be exiting some areas of work as we focus on today’s challenges, as well as those we will face tomorrow. And yes, we will also be reducing our headcount significantly, seeking to ensure more money goes out to where it’s most needed.”...
https://thepostmillennial.com/george-soros-son-shifts-priorities-resources-to-focus-on-defeating-maga-in-2024
i knew when i read the following that all efforts would now be focused on ‘24:
20 Aug: Guardian: George Soros foundation’s retreat from Europe could ‘turn off the lights’ for human rights
Activists fear the billionaire’s legacy will be lost as his Open Society Foundations curbs its activities across the EU
by Philip Oltermann in Berlin
He survived the Nazi occupation of his native Hungary, made a fortune on Wall Street and became one of ***the most steadfast backers of democracy and human rights in the eastern bloc.
Several beneficiaries of Soros’s Open Society Foundations (OSF), chaired since the start of this year by his son Alex, told the Observer they would struggle without its support amid an authoritarian rollback...
As traditional European media outlets have struggled to live up to their role amid a drop in advertising revenue, OSF has stepped in to support independent news projects including the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP), London-based Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Forbidden Stories, an encrypted online platform that allows threatened journalists to securely upload their work and be continued by others.
Soros-backed funds swooped when independent media institutions were under threat from state-linked takeovers, buying an 11.2% share in the publisher of Gazeta Wyborcza after Poland’s governing PiS party launched legal proceedings against the centre-left newspaper and ordered state-owned companies to cancel their advertising.
***The Guardian too receives OSF funding on specific reporting projects...
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/aug/19/george-soross-retreat-from-europe-could-turn-off-the-lights-for-human-rights
Why do all these “reporters” glom on to the “bombshell” for everything? It detracts from the facts by making it sound like a tabloid story.
So where is the GA AG?
Bookark
bbb fani act blue
DA Fani a diehard Demorat rigorously observed the election
<><>she didn’t believe the 2020 election was accurate,
<><>she never believed that her boy Biden won fair and square
<><>b/c her belief was that the 2020 election was rigged.
Yet, she’s prosecuting Trump because he didn’t believe it, either.
Maybe she ought to investigate, and indict, herself.......snx.
p
A review of Fani Willis’ indictment against Trump reveals the woman actually reads
at third grade level w/ a zero IQ. Her ludicrous, politically motivated charges include:
<><>criminalizing free speech,
<><>listing numerous mundane “acts” she “says” further a “conspiracy” to overturn the 2020 election.
<><>criminalizing text asking for phone nos “to chat with state leaders”
<><>Trump’s conversations on election results as a “furtherance” of alleged crimes.
<><>Trump’s tweets constitute a “furtherance” of alleged crimes
<><>Trump conspiring when he asked voters to watch televised GA Legislature hearings.
Upshot: Willis would give Democrats a monopoly on election results conversations.
Reality Check
In 2017, a woman sued conservative actor, James Woods, for misidentifying her as a Nazi in an allegedly libelous tweet. The tweet included a photo not of her but of a different woman giving a Nazi salute while wearing a Donald Trump t-shirt at a campaign event.
The court ruled in favor of Woods under the “innocent construction rule.”
She appealed, but the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit upheld the ruling.
The “innocent construction rule” requires courts to consider a written or oral statement in context, giving the words, and their implications, their natural and obvious meaning.
If a statement may reasonably be interpreted innocently, it cannot be actionable per se. [Republic Tobacco Co. v. N. Atl. Trading Co., 381 F.3d 717, 726-727 (7th Cir. Ill. 2004)]
Fani Willis, Who Indicted Trump for Questioning Election Tweets, Questioned Election in Tweets
Front Page Magazine ^ | August 25, 2023 | Daniel Greenfield
fr Posted on 8/26/2023, 6:51:43 PM by E. Pluribus Unum
Two sets of laws. Selective prosecution means they get enforced only against political opponents.
And so the nation watched the disgraceful circus unfold in Atlanta with a pro-crime DA indicting her political opponents including former President Trump for, among other things, tweets.
Benny Johnson however documented multiple instances of Fani Willis, the DA, tweeting her skepticism of the election and calling it into question.
Like this one in which she seizes on the water leaks to raise questions about the count as Trump’s associates have been accused of doing.
at web site
Questioning elections is obviously illegal when Democrats win but an urgent defense of democracy when Republicans win. Since Fani Willis did not yet know the outcome of the election, it was ‘legal’ to question it at the time because she was worried a Republican might win, but once a Dem had won it, it became retroactively illegal to question it.
(Excerpt) Read more at frontpagemag.com ...
Alvin Bragg is also a beneficiary of same. Do we have a pattern here?
Ping for later...
People wholly without recommendation, experience, discernment, education or competence join these races with the tacit understanding that they will not/CANNOT be elected ... but they campaign anyway just to stuff their pockets.
I don’t know if this is true. It probably is but it may not be.
This said it is tiresome to read the Surrender Monkey’s that are still stuck in 2022 whine and say nothing will happen.
If this is true she will be punished. Take that to the bank.
How?
Malicious prosecution leading to disbarment.
Think Mike Nifong and that was in a far less Red North Carolina with far less chance of success.
I knew Big Fani was a crook. “I’ll sock it to ya, daddy!”
These are criminal charges. LOCK THEM UP!! no excuse for allowing them freedom to continue.
I ain’t holdin’ my breath.