[Rowdyone]

It’s obvious that private email accounts using aliases have been used to avoid scrutiny, FOIA requests and discovery of embarrassing conversations/situations. But I also think a legitimate case can be made that some are legitimate “advisors” communications as well. NRRA requirements do not sufficiently allow for unfettered advice and response for a President. Yet workarounds are often also done for nefarious reasons. Sunlight, without editing, is the answer.

[Ex-Con777]

>But I also think a legitimate case can be made that some are legitimate “advisors” communications as well. <

That nut has already been cracked. Arrest the advisors and charge them with conspiracy. Confiscate all of their computers and communications equipment.

EC

[Political Junkie Too]

It’s obvious that private email accounts using aliases have been used to avoid scrutiny... But I also think a legitimate case can be made that some are legitimate “advisors” communications as well.

But not on a free public service like Gmail. Up until 2017, Google routinely scanned all gmail for advertising purposes. If Obama, Biden, Clinton, and others were using gmail accounts to "advise" each other, then those emails were being routinely scanned by Google and other Google-authorized 3rd party apps.

We're not talking about ISP-provided email services here.

-PJ