You are trying to make some kind of distinction. Yes?
Given what we “know” about Epstein, it would seem that ANYONE who met with Epstein is worth much scrutiny.
BTW - isn’t that somehow the justification for a lot of the FISA warrants and other investigations?
“Someone to whom X spoke talked to Y, who then talked to Z. So we have to talk to everyone who had any contacts with Y and/or Z.”
> You are trying to make some kind of distinction. Yes? <
People met with Epstein for business reasons. I would not want to be anywhere near such a vile and evil person. But just meeting with him is not an automatic red flag. Too many people unfortunately put ethics aside when money is involved.
Going to his island is a completely different story. Those people had to have a decent idea of what was going on there. And it didn’t involve money. Yet they went.
“ Given what we “know” about Epstein, it would seem that ANYONE who met with Epstein is worth much scrutiny.
BTW - isn’t that somehow the justification for a lot of the FISA warrants and other investigations?
“Someone to whom X spoke talked to Y, who then talked to Z. So we have to talk to everyone who had any contacts with Y and/or Z.””
The problem here is that nearly everyone who is a celebrity “met” with him at some time. He knew everyone in DC and Hollywood.
If we start accusing everyone he met with as being a pedophile we lose credibility and the pedophiles get away with it. The focus has to be on those that went to the island