[ChicagoConservative27]

Tree rings and ice cores??? I have heard it all now.

[Dr.Deth]

So what? Adapt.

[Da Coyote]

No one with above single digit IQ believes anything coming out of the U.N. I’d bet Guterres couldn’t pass a 1900 high school science exam. (He’d naturally max a 2023 woke high school science exam by merely signing his name.)

[Ann Archy]

ALL ABOUT CONTROLLING US!

[rdcbn1]

This is gaslighting.

There is absolutely zero evidence that there has been any significant world wide climate change.

[FlingWingFlyer]

These third world fruitcakes running the old cold war dinosaur have got to go. The cold war is over. We don’t need the so-called United Nations anymore. Time to defund that money hungry, America-hating commie beast.

[TexasFreeper2009]

lol

but if it was unusually cold, they would say it was only “weather”

[SaveFerris]

U.S.A. out of U.N.

U.N. out of U.S.A.

[Spok]

Who are the “scientists”? We need to start challenging these unsupported conclusory assertions. It’s NOT science-it’s propaganda!

[noiseman]

Wait a minute…We were promised we had another 6.5 years.

[17th Miss Regt]

This is serious. If the climate breaks down, we will not have a climate at all!

[ConservativeInPA]

The world is filled with statistical mental midgets. When you think about it, just an itty bitty bit (that’s scientific measurement terminology /s), nearly every temperature reading they take is a proxy. There is mixed use of satellite and surface temperatures using vastly different instruments. Even the technology on satellites has changed significantly over our lifetimes. Try comparing analog and digital ground thermometers or account for changes in the local environment that have occurred over time, such as grass airfields becoming paved runways, and it’s like comparing apples and oranges. Then relying on ice cores and tree rings gives two different other degrees of accuracy.

Their fear mongering is based on a couple degree change in global temperature. That’s a projection in the future using computer models. The computer models also have margins for error. If you want a visual example of how far off computer models can be, just look at the couple dozen computer models that are used to predict hurricane course and landfall. They are all different and they are all inaccurate for a week in advance and these clowns are trying to predict temperature decades in the future.

This is political science, not science.

I can tell you that there is climate change. It has been occurring since the earth has had a climate. There are several very interesting things that have occurred in just the last hundred years. The world’s population has exploded. Starvation has nearly been eradicated. Lifespans have dramatically increased. Poverty as it existed an hundred years ago is nearly nonexistent today. Man is thriving. Yes, it is a little bit warmer. But man has adapted.

We do not know how much warmer it is today than 50 or even 100 years ago with any degree of accuracy because in real science, measurements and observations mean everything. We do know that man is thriving. We need to focus on real problems; and the real problem at hand is this march towards global communism. That’s the political science behind climate science.

[butlerweave]

This Socialist is an Idiot

[antidemoncrat]

Hurry hurry ... save the planet ... send us all your money and start eating algae and bugs

[aquila48]

Bookmark

[Libloather]

...the veteran Portuguese socialist said...

There it is.

[Organic Panic]

AND Biden is shutting down cheap air conditioning.