Posted on 10/13/2023 8:08:30 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
The climate-change scheme and net-zero carbon policy are based upon a false notion that carbon dioxide and other gases cause global warming. They do not. We don’t have to guess about this. We have empirical and scientific proof.
I owned a Weights and Measures gas-physics test-and-repair facility and conducted tests. We learned gas physics from engineers at factories that manufacture gas-physics instruments. They must understand gas physics, or their instruments won’t work.
How academia got this wrong
In 1988, James Hansen flip-flopped from “global cooling” to “global warming” being dangerous.
Al Gore fed the fear with $22 billion in annual funding for universities and professors to study the matter. Hansen’s claim is a falsehood. People move to warmer climes for their health. Consider all the species, in the plant and animal kingdoms, that thrive near the equator, whereas none survives at the poles.
Yet, out of desperation for the money, professors cornered themselves into attempts to prove a falsehood to be true. To do that, one must lie. Each lie created new falsehoods until they have made gas physics look like a child’s messy bedroom strewn with theories.
Nearly everything we have heard about global warming for the past thirty-five years has been from the professorial world, which has been untested theory. How often have their declarations and predictions come true?
Because their world is theoretical, they use peer review for approval. But there is no such thing as peer review in the private sector; either something works or it does not, and everything is tested. Engineers who design gas-physics instruments must be correct, or their instruments fail, buildings might burn, and they certainly would be fired.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Scientific proof? Is that like “facts”? Because branDUHn reminded us that ‘they’ will choose “truth” over “facts” everytime.
Greedy, money hungry Climate Changelings cause “global warming.”
Wonder how long it will take for the Global Warming Nuts to try and debunk this?
Mars would be very hot ,LOL
It was never about climate, only about control.
The warming impact of CO2 levels off at 400ppm. Been known for years.
And they came for our straws, our plastic bags, our cars, etc etc....
In fact, it's cold as hell.
cold as hell , good one
Bookmark
I don’t see how his argument about gases cooling has anything to do with the “greenhouse gas” theory. I don’t believe in man-made global warming, but this article doesn’t seem to address the actual idea of how it WOULD work, if it happened.
The purpose of global warming is the destruction of freedom.
That’s right.
I hear Venus is warm this time of year…
Without weighing into the larger matter of the validity of global warming, the author demonstrates a grade-school, but not a high-school level of physics knowledge, when he says stuff like this: “Kinetic energy (motion) is continuously destroyed in a gravitational field. Put bluntly, a six-year-old can see that a baseball rolls to a stop.”
No! The momentum of the ball is transferred into heat energy. YouTube is filled with examples of this, including baking a chicken by slapping it. (It took some engineering to make sure the slap energy was converted to heat, rather than mechanically disintegrating the chicken. So instead of one, 3,000 mph slap, it takes thousands of slower slaps.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.