Posted on 10/24/2023 3:41:07 PM PDT by navysealdad
Former President Donald Trump's final chief of staff in the White House, Mark Meadows, has spoken with special counsel Jack Smith's team at least three times this year, including once before a federal grand jury, which came only after Smith granted Meadows immunity to testify under oath, according to sources familiar with the matter.
(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...
im sure this isn’t what happened. Catherine herring told abc news the story wasn’t correct but they did it anyways.
Exactly!!!
Maybe he whispered it under his breath, or in his mind, or in his imagination. Can he prove Trump heard him? Is it a crime not to listen to Mark Meadows? Or is it all just a pointless charade by Dems to take down Trump?
He got immunity for giving his opinion. LOL!
I knew that election was bogus as soon as Trump was way ahead on election night so they stopped counting.
It was a no-brainer that they were doing the counting shenanigans again.
Nothing wrong with warning someone.
Unless you work for the Clintons and then that will get you a short visit to Fort Marcy Park.
Zactly
So Mark Meadows basically testified that he had a different opinion about the election fraud than Trump and 81 million Americans did. 😆. So what?
Thats as close to honesty as you are gonna get.
I shouldn't be one to talk but I wasn't in Congress and the White House.
What else is he willing to lie about?
Yes. I think we all figured that out. And that was just the beginning of the weeks-long theft activities.
Innocent people get convicted all the time. It’s not fair, but what makes you think Trump will be treated fairly?
Not only federal prison but I suspect the Epstein treatment as well
He leaked that Trump was doing worse than was being disclosed when he had to go to the hospital for COVID but I dont know if Ivanka okayed the leak.
Hopefully you see the difference between the two vastly different & distinct instances.
What Mark Medows said he said is irrelevant. Mark Medows has no personal knowledge that there was no fraud in every precinct sufficient to change the outcome of the election. PERIOD. Nothing Mark Medows can testify to is probative of the alleged fact that there was no such fraud.
So he told Trump, the President, that he thought he did not win the election. Trump, the President, did not heed his advice.
Have I got that right? Odd, I do not remember voting for Mark Meadows for anything.
Meadows warning Trump does not establish that Trump did anything illegal. Trump was certainly free to ignore advice from any party.
it makes no difference if 10000000000000 people disagreed with Trump, only that HE believed the election was stolen.
BINGO!!!!!
Your post makes sense to us commoners!!....exactly right. This is Mark Meadows OPINION!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.