Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child
In your hypothetical, who does have legal standing to use the federal courts to force a state to follow its own election laws, or more likely, to follow Constitutional requirements?
34 posted on 10/26/2023 5:25:52 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: marktwain
The citizens of the state where the election laws were violated have clear standing — in STATE court.

And what particular “Constitutional requirement” is involved here?

36 posted on 10/26/2023 5:33:21 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

P.S. — the Federal courts can only take action in cases where Federal laws or constitutional issues are at stake. That’s why election challenges in Federal courts are almost always based on matters related to the Civil Rights Act or the Voting Rights Act.


38 posted on 10/26/2023 5:37:56 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson