Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child

The Constitution confers upon the legislature of each state the power to direct the manner in which the electors are chosen.

That being the case, why is it that the state’s executive branch certifies whether the electors were chosen legally? If the electors were not chosen according to the manner in which the state’s legislature directed, then the Constitution has been violated. - specifically, the US Constitution has been violated.

Potential violations of the US Constitution are the purvey of the United States, not just the state in which the violation occurred.


60 posted on 10/26/2023 8:28:35 AM PDT by enumerated (81 million votes my ass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: enumerated
That being the case, why is it that the state’s executive branch certifies whether the electors were chosen legally?

In my particular state, the legislature gave the executive branch a wide range of oversight authority and powers to do exactly that.

That’s why I said from the start (September-November 2020) that the legislatures in all the contested states should have convened and set their own clear ground rules to deal with the overreach (as I saw it) of their executive branch officials.

62 posted on 10/26/2023 8:47:57 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson