Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newest F-35, F-15EX contracts are set. Here’s how much they cost
Breaking Defense ^ | October 26, 2023 at 4:15 PM | Michael Marrow

Posted on 10/27/2023 6:12:14 AM PDT by Fish Speaker

WASHINGTON — The flyaway cost for the F-15EX Eagle II is approximately $90 million for each aircraft in the program’s second production lot, about $7.5 million more than the newest price for an F-35A, Breaking Defense has learned.

The Air Force has confirmed to Breaking Defense that a contract for the next three production lots of the Boeing-made F-15EX was finalized on Sept. 28, a major milestone for the program. But the $90 million per unit cost in the contract — a number that is expected to grow in successive lots — will likely raise eyebrows among critics both within and outside the service who argue that officials should focus on buying more F-35s.

Under the new agreement, the price for an F-15EX will start at “approximately” $90 million for lot 2, rise to $97 million in lot 3 and then dip to $94 million in lot 4, according to an Air Force spokesperson. The two parties previously finalized a deal for the aircraft’s first lot in November 2022, setting a flyaway price of $80.5 million for six jets with two test aircraft already purchased — meaning the costs on the F-15EX are going up per unit year over year until the fourth lot is introduced. (The Air Force measures flyaway price in then-year dollars, which are adjusted for inflation.)

As a cost comparison, F-35 Joint Program Office spokesman Russ Goemaere told Breaking Defense that the Air Force’s variant of the stealth fighter has an “average” flyaway cost of $82.5 million for the jet’s 15th, 16th and 17th production lots, which will be delivered in calendar years 2023, 2024 and 2025.

(Excerpt) Read more at breakingdefense.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Technical
KEYWORDS: contracts; costs; f15ex; f35
It makes sense to have separate airframes for different missions rather than try to force one airframe to do every mission.
1 posted on 10/27/2023 6:12:14 AM PDT by Fish Speaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Fish Speaker

Well, to be fair, the F-35A, F-35B, and F-35C air frames are so different that they are different air frames with only a small degree of commonality between air frame parts, but there is a larger degree of commonality among other parts.


2 posted on 10/27/2023 6:16:37 AM PDT by rlmorel ("If you think tough men are dangerous, just wait until you see what weak men are capable of." JBP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fish Speaker

“It makes sense to have separate airframes for different missions rather than try to force one airframe to do every mission.”

What are you, some kind of radical? According to Japanese culture, it is more efficient to build 2000 identical aircraft that suck at everything, than to build 500 each of 4 types that are good at everything.

If you need further details, I suggest you get a Harvard MBA, you know, like the guys running our military have.


3 posted on 10/27/2023 6:16:46 AM PDT by BobL (Trump gets my vote, even if I have to write him in; Millions of others will do the same)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fish Speaker
Boeing-made

That just fills me with confidence that the taxpayer has gotten the best bargain possible.

4 posted on 10/27/2023 6:21:48 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

Don’t worry, Boeing will ensure their diversity hires are employed.


5 posted on 10/27/2023 6:33:47 AM PDT by CodeToad (Rule#1: The elites want you dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

Their VTOL plant is right outside Chester, PA. Lots of melanin there…


6 posted on 10/27/2023 8:44:04 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Fish Speaker

Except it makes no sense whatsoever to buy new, non-stealth fighter/attack aircraft.

None.

An F-35 could fly the entire length of the Ukraine front and get back home safely. An F-15 would be shot down in the first 50 miles.


7 posted on 10/27/2023 9:03:27 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fish Speaker

Who is Biden’s inside man?


8 posted on 10/27/2023 9:22:44 AM PDT by Organic Panic (Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

When the 737Max problems first hit the news, I browsed thru Boeing’s web site. It was full of happy DEI horse apples. While correlation is not causation, . . .


9 posted on 10/27/2023 1:06:16 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

Uh it is. They still cannot do software. There are government standards on software which Boeing follows and the government pays for. Musk, who grew up coding, does other things instead. His software is a lot cheaper and works. He could get paid a lot more doing what he is told and producing stuff that is worthless.


10 posted on 10/27/2023 1:10:59 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson