At least one professor and one student are speaking up. Keep doing it!
Elihu Yale and William F Buckley are spinning in their graves.
I wonder if the YDN refused to publish articles about Russia/Trump connections because they were unsubstantiated. I bet not. In fact I can safely say without looking that almost all of the YDN’s articles are unsubstantiated editorializing
the left wants all Jews DEAD.
It is as simple as that. Don’t fall for their “free speech” BS in situations like this. If the same people were calling for “death to blacks!” or “death to gays!” they would be expelled, doxed, and charged with a hate crime faster than you could read about it!
But because it’s ok to the left to kill all the Jews, NOTHING will be done about this!
The NAZI’s were left wing, and the Democratic party is showing their true Nazi leanings.
That’s where GW the moron went to school.
I’m sure he’ll condemn Yale for supporting terrorism when he gets tired of bashing Trump 😏
Look at the thread on Hamas Atrocities. There are a total of four photos or videos of rape taken during the Hamas massacre/raid/ghazwa in posts 6, 7, 8, 9. Click on view image if you are brave.
p. 39 Rape
Muhammad allowed his men to rape the women captured in raids. However Muslims faced a dilemma. They wanted to have sex with their female captives, but also wanted to return them for ransom and therefore did not want to make them pregnant. Some of these women were already married whose husbands had escaped when taken by surprise and were still alive. The raiders considered the possibility of "coitus interruptus" (withdrawing from intercourse before ejaculation). Unsure of the best course of action, they sought the counsel of their Prophet. Buhkari reports:
Abu Saeed said "We went out with Allah's Apostle for the Ghazwa of Banu Al-Mustaliq and we received captives from among the Arab captives and we desired women and celibacy became hard on us and we loved to do coitus interruptus. So when we intended to do coitus interruptus, we said "How can we do coitus interruptus before asking Allah's Apostle who is present among us?" We asked (him) about it and he said "It is better for you not to do so, for if any soul (till the Day of Resurrection) is predestined to exists, it will exist.
Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 59, Number 459.
Muhammed did not forbid raping the captive women. Instead he made an asinine claim that when Allah intends to create someone, nothing can prevent it. He told his men that coitus interruptus is ill-advised because it would be an attempt to thwart the will of Allah. He did not say a word against the rape of the captives, and by discouraging coitus interruptus, he supported forced insemination.
He made even his god legitimize with women captured in wars, the so-called "right hand possessions," even if they were married before their capture.
The subhuman treatment of non-Muslim women by jihadi organizations such as the Islamic State or Nigeria's Boko Haram - where "infidel women are bought, sold, gang-raped, mutilated, dismembered and burned alive - is relatively well known (thanks to ISIS itself, for disseminating images and videos). Less well known is that "infidel" women are treated in similar ways all across the Muslim world, as explained by a 2016 report:
Once social media was censored as “hate speech” or “misinformation” as about Covid jabs and masks the young people thought they can censor and cancel accounts for anything on a whim.
Now genuine horrors in the news can disappear or be distorted.
Terrible trend that must be reversed.
Yale snotty-nosed retards can’t handle the truth.