Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: george76
[Weiss] added “That’s the way I interpreted it.”

Since when does someone's tortuous backflips to protect his perjurer boss in full Nietzsche supersede the cold, required elements of the relevant criminal charge?

Neither Clinton's "It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is." nor this dancing from Weiss pass any smell test, as the vast majority of unbiased observers will confirm.

2 posted on 11/13/2023 9:47:36 AM PST by rx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rx

Clear as mud. That is Weiss’s testimony. Trying to clarify mud is to see what a person wants to see. And the other two lawyers, Estrada and Graves, are dirty, too.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/hunter-biden-investigation-david-weiss-sought-charges-dc

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/california-us-attorney-hunter-biden-scrutiny


3 posted on 11/13/2023 10:26:40 AM PST by gloryblaze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson