I'm sure it's a total joke to this child and her mother. /s
FWIW, about 15 years ago I had a relative who left her physically and sexually abusive husband. And it was just a “she said- he said situation” as there were many neutral 3rd party witnesses to the abuse, and he had been previously arrested and convicted of forcible rape of another woman but got out early on parole for “good behavior and time served”, served only about 5 months in jail.
Despite this, he was granted “supervised” visitation and one day didn’t return the 4-year-old to his mother after a supposedly “supervised” visitation.
He and the child were found days later, several states away at a motel. He had slit the child’s throat and then shot himself in the head and left a note saying the “bitch” had it coming.
Your timeline isn’t clear. If she knew about his past when she married him, she invited herself to that party. And this sentence doesn’t make any sense at all. “And it was just a “she said- he said situation” as there were many neutral 3rd party witnesses to the abuse”. Not sure what you were trying to say there. But it doesn’t appear that you got it said.
The problem is that all amber alerts are not created equal.
Most custody dispute Amber alerts are one parent (who will take good care of the kid) stealing the kid from another parent who will take good care of the kid.
Of course there are exceptions—but they are rare.
Monsters always take it out on innocent little children.