To: seanmerc
The FBI already has the clear images. This is to protect the FBI agents involved from discovery.
Why doesn’t someone call this guy on his bee ess?
5 posted on
12/06/2023 9:56:13 AM PST by
Fido969
(45 is Superman! )
To: Fido969
Yep, how else was the fbi able to dragnet 1,000 people already if they don’t already have the tapes?
17 posted on
12/06/2023 10:13:59 AM PST by
Pollard
(Stick a fork in the USA, it's done!)
To: Fido969
Why doesn’t someone call this guy on his bee ess?
Because he’s already corrected his statement, but the same headline is still going around.
29 posted on
12/06/2023 10:37:16 AM PST by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: Fido969
The FBI already has the clear images.
This is an example of why the new speaker can not be trusted. He is directly lying to us.
32 posted on
12/06/2023 10:50:17 AM PST by
JoSixChip
(2020: The year of unreported truths; 2021: My main take away from this year? Trust no one.)
To: Fido969
It also now gives the media a reason to call anything they do not like doctored video.
37 posted on
12/06/2023 11:31:52 AM PST by
pas
To: Fido969
The FBI uses face recognition software to match up Jan 6 protesters with social media. But that only goes so far, since many of us don’t have pictures on the internet.
However, once the footage is released to the public, democrats can start turning in their neighbors and coworkers, etc., and don’t think they won’t do it.
If I was there that day, I’d want my face blurred. Just sayin’.
39 posted on
12/06/2023 12:15:23 PM PST by
enumerated
(81 million votes my ass)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson