Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: struggle

“Affirmed: “Specifically, we affirm the Order to the extent it prohibits all parties and their counsel from making or directing others to make public statements about known or reasonably foreseeable witnesses concerning their potential participation in the investigation or in this criminal proceeding.””

Not being a lawyer then I would need examples to understand exactly what that means.


13 posted on 12/08/2023 1:05:51 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Revel

They don’t want witnesses intimidated or potential jurors led to prejudge the credibility of witnesses. I dont think it’s unreasonable


17 posted on 12/08/2023 1:17:05 PM PST by j.havenfarm (22 years on Free Republic, 12/10/22! more then 6500 replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Revel

Don’t talk about witnesses. Mock the judge and prosecutor all he wants along with the evidence.


32 posted on 12/08/2023 4:47:10 PM PST by MTBobcat (The “rank-and-file” are as corrupted as their leadership.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson