Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Special counsel asks Supreme Court to immediately decide if Trump is immune from Jan. 6 prosecution
NBC News ^ | 12/11/2023 | Lawrence Hurley

Posted on 12/11/2023 12:42:08 PM PST by Kevin in California

Special counsel Jack Smith on Monday asked the Supreme Court to immediately step in to decide whether former President Donald Trump has immunity from prosecution for his actions seeking to overturn the 2020 election.

"This case presents a fundamental question at the heart of our democracy: whether a former President is absolutely immune from federal prosecution for crimes committed while in office," Smith wrote in the court filing.

Smith said it was "of imperative public importance" that the high court decide the question so that Trump's trial, currently scheduled for March, can move forward as quickly as possible.

The Supreme Court decides which cases it hears, so it is not required to take up the case.

NBC News has reached out to Trump's attorneys for comment on the special counsel's filing.

Earlier this month, U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is presiding over the election interference case, denied Trump's motion to dismiss his indictment on presidential immunity and constitutional grounds, prompting Trump to appeal and ask for the case to be put on hold.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bananademocracy; bananarepublic; electioninterference; heartofourdemocracy; jacksmith; jagoffsmith; jerksmith; lawrencehurles; lawrencehurley; ourdemocracy; trumppersecution; unrepresentative
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
Hey Jagoff Smith, please elaborate on what crimes Trump committed while in office?

I don't recall Trump ever being convicted in a court of law for any crimes. Maybe I was sick that day.

1 posted on 12/11/2023 12:42:08 PM PST by Kevin in California
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

The SCOTUS could end this nightmare once and for all.


2 posted on 12/11/2023 12:43:23 PM PST by CatOwner (Don't expect anyone, even conservatives, to have your back when the SHTF in 2021 and beyond.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California
The current Commander In Chief is immune, regardless of Jagoff Smith or SCOTUS.
3 posted on 12/11/2023 12:46:05 PM PST by C210N (Mundus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California
Hey Jagoff Smith, please elaborate on what crimes Trump committed while in office?

Correct. There were no crimes.
4 posted on 12/11/2023 12:46:18 PM PST by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

“”” “This case presents a fundamental question at the heart of our democracy: whether a former President is absolutely immune from federal prosecution for crimes committed while in office,” Smith wrote”””


Is this a back door way to keep Trump off the ballot?


5 posted on 12/11/2023 12:51:13 PM PST by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter

Everything is about keeping Trump off that ballot. Everything. They know it’s their only chance.


6 posted on 12/11/2023 12:52:58 PM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner

It could. But what’s the rush? It only proves Jagoff did this purely for political reasons. Taking the standard path will delay his manufactured guilty verdict until after the election.

I have no doubt he would never push to have Trump’s later appeal to go on the fast track.

EC


7 posted on 12/11/2023 12:53:03 PM PST by Ex-Con777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

I guess what they’re trying to do is to create a whole new American revolution. If the Supreme Court ruled against Trump, I think you would say game on.


8 posted on 12/11/2023 12:53:16 PM PST by ncfool (America has died we are living in the united socialist states of aMeriKa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter

i guess this is how they can get biden to be safe from prosecution after his term is over...


9 posted on 12/11/2023 12:54:06 PM PST by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world or something )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Jack Smith should not be a special counsel or a council of any kind since he doesn’t know what kind of government the United States has. It is not a democracy. It has never been a democracy. It is not a Democratic Republic.

The United States of America was created as and is a republic.


10 posted on 12/11/2023 12:55:35 PM PST by StrictConstructionist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: teeman8r
i guess this is how they can get biden to be safe from prosecution after his term is over...

I actually would be okay with the trade-off because they are never going to have Brandon charged for any crime while he's still living.

11 posted on 12/11/2023 12:56:23 PM PST by CatOwner (Don't expect anyone, even conservatives, to have your back when the SHTF in 2021 and beyond.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: teeman8r

Biden’s crimes span 40 years, not just his time as POTATUS.


12 posted on 12/11/2023 12:56:49 PM PST by Magnum44 (...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner

But they won’t. They will deny this request and force it to the appeals court. They deal with appeals of appeals.


13 posted on 12/11/2023 12:57:30 PM PST by for-q-clinton (Cancel Culture IS fascism...Let's start calling it that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California
It might be more insidious. If Trump is not libel for “crimes” during office does this get Biden off for all the congressional laws that the executive branch is ignoring during this term in office. And could the minions following orders not get prosecuted for their actions if the boss approved it.
14 posted on 12/11/2023 12:58:26 PM PST by Liaison (TANSTAAFL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

Could Biden pre-pardon Hillary, Pelosi, Obama, Jarrett, Wray, etc., etc., etc.?


15 posted on 12/11/2023 12:59:44 PM PST by ryderann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner

It could, if we had a real Supreme Court. It would say simply that precent gives the President unqualified immunity and not only that but he was already tried and found not guilty by the procedure established in the Constitution - impeachment. Of course such corrupt thugs like Smith, Chutkin and the rest of the democrats don’t believe in the Constitution — especially when it gets in the way of their agenda.


16 posted on 12/11/2023 1:01:01 PM PST by falcon99 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

According to the Constitution, only the Senate can after an Impeachment by teh House, Not the Supreme Court.................


17 posted on 12/11/2023 1:01:19 PM PST by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while l aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

Exactly, what crime?


18 posted on 12/11/2023 1:02:15 PM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

They should rule Jack doesn’t have standing.

They didn’t expedite the election cases, so why this one? Let it wind through the courts.

The NY Times says Trump’s legal team is trying to delay the case. How does the NY Times know Trump’s legal team’s strategy?


19 posted on 12/11/2023 1:02:52 PM PST by alternatives?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: teeman8r
I guess this is how they can get biden to be safe from prosecution after his term is over...

Not just biden but a whole slew of others too. Basically what this smith clown is asking SCOTUS to do is render a guilty verdict for Trump for all accused crimes without a trial! SCOTUS should tell the idiot to go pound salt....

20 posted on 12/11/2023 1:03:13 PM PST by eeriegeno (Checks and balances??? What checks and balances?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson