Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lastchance
As a result, universities have had to tolerate hate speech — even hate speech calling for violence against ethnic or religious minorities.

In reality, this is a patently false statement.

The Ivys are being called out for SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT. Conservatives and Jewish folks…no protection. A leftist burning down a lecture hall? Well, that’s frustration.

May I present as evidence, Harvard University Anti-Bullying Policy

To wit:

A. Definition of Bullying

Bullying, used as a shorthand for hostile and abusive behavior or power-based harassment, is defined here as harmful interpersonal aggression by words or actions that humiliate, degrade, demean, intimidate, or threaten2 an individual or individuals. For a violation of the Policy to occur, such aggression must be sufficiently severe or pervasive, and objectively offensive, that it creates a work, educational, or living environment that a reasonable person would consider intimidating, hostile, or abusive and denies the individual an equal opportunity to participate in the benefits of the workplace or the institution’s programs and activities.

Harvard could have easily shut down the antisemitism, per Policy. INSTEAD, HRVARD LET ANTISEMITISM RIDE.

53 posted on 12/13/2023 11:44:13 AM PST by DoodleBob (Gravity's waiting period is about 9.8 m/s²)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleBob

Thanks for pointing out their quisling.


61 posted on 12/13/2023 12:23:01 PM PST by lastchance (Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson