It's too soon to jump into the sewer with Ds. They'll be plenty of time for that IF SCOTUS misfires. Ds are fully aware that turnabout will be fairplay, and far more damaging in states where it could have a much more devastating impact than Colorado or probably Maine.
SecState Bellow's (surely Soros backed precisely for reasons and actions like this) unilateral decree has no prayer. They know it and probably don't want it to succeed because of reasons mentioned. She's likely looking for pub and/or a governorship.
Maine, btw, proportions EC votes. Biden got 3, Trump 1. Imagine if Trump wins 3 swing states (AZ, Wisc, and Georgia) and ends in a 269-269 EC tie because of this one lost Maine EC vote because he was prohibited from the ballot.
SC can not stay out on this one.
The Ds will jump with joy to "be forced to replace Joe" as the nominee if Rs take his name off state ballots, thus blaming the "Torching" (and all manner of related Toricelli-esque shenanigans (e.g., rule evisceration) on R action.
The names Kameluh, Susan Rice and Moochelle would quickly be put "out there," with Mooch deemed by Barry to the most popular.
No, no D/R presidential nominees' name removals will survive SCOTUS scrutiny without there having been a conviction for insurrection. Since that's not happening before the 2024 election, it'll die on the vine.
BUT! Rs will not mount an attempt to remove Brandon's name because PDJT and the Rs need this set of efforts to be deemed election interference exclusively by the Ds. It would not be good for Rs to give the Ds the opportunity to say, "See, if there's election interference guilt here, it must be shared equally by the Rs!"