Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: j.havenfarm

bottom line then is:

congress must initiate it

correct ?


93 posted on 12/30/2023 10:57:43 AM PST by chiller (Davey Crockett said: "Be sure you're right. Then go ahead'. I'll go ahead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: chiller

Correct. The lack of enabling legislation leaves massive due process issues that are being dealt with on an ad hoc basis that simply
Cannot be tolerated lest the presidential electoral system collapse: does the language of the 14th apply to POTUS at
All? is it necessary that the person be convicted of the crime of insurrection?
If not, is it state courts that have jurisdiction to make the determination? Can administrative agencies such as the Maine SOS
Make the determination? What is the standard of proof— the preponderance of the evidence or beyond a reasonable doubt?
If court proceedings are necessary, who has standing to bring the case?
Is there a right to a trial? Is there a right to a jury trial? Etc etc

These are light years from being minor issues, and I just don’t see SCOTUS opening the door to chaos by allowing SCOC to stand


101 posted on 12/30/2023 11:27:51 AM PST by j.havenfarm (23 years on Free Republic, 12/22/23! More than 8,000 replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson