Posted on 01/05/2024 3:10:08 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
Pro Tip: If you're ever considering hiring Ken Block to do research for you, consider again. And should you decide to go forward, be absolutely sure to get an ironclad NDA.
Otherwise, if Block finds it to his advantage, he might publicly disclose information he discovered while working for you that is contrary to your interests. And might even publicly denounce you as a liar!
After the 2020 election, the Trump campaign hired Block to look for evidence of voter fraud. He apparently found none of significance, and now has written a book disclosing his findings, and a column in USA Today accusing Trump of lying about the election.
Block appeared on today's Morning Joe to discuss the matter. And of all people, it was Mika Brzezinski who called him out on undermining his erstwhile client:
"So Ken, I'm assuming that your company, when they take on a client, they do work for them that is to stay private. That's part of the deal, probably, and part of making sure that you remain respected in the field So I guess my question is, what prompted you to completely unearth everything that you did for the former president?"
Get the rest of the story and view the video here.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
Score a rare one for Mika, who challenges this guy who betrayed his client and cashed in.
Ping to Liberal Media Criticism list.
A fat creepy looking dude
Precisely
Consider this, maybe the guy didn’t find it because he is incompetent.
*It allows Ken Block to do damage control.
*It provides Block an opportunity to describe the "dire gravity" of the situation that necessitated his disclosure.
*It promotes Mika (falsely) as an unbiased interviewer.
Look at the statement below the screen capture. This has the earmarks of a straw man, rather than unwitting integrity.
Another possibility is that one will not find something that one doesn't seek.
Why is it a score for mika to have a guy on her show seeking to say whatever he chooses? They have plenty on the show (from what it seems since I don’t watch but hear and see report or clip) who say what they choose to. Doesn’t make it true always. Many opinion or agenda driven shows and get people to come on to support their efforts.
We all have seen video and other reports, witness statements that there were many many election irregularities. Made me realize I was given wrong supplies to vote by person in 2008 election, I didn’t know at the time but vote negating or changing techniques were being used then. Cheaters often look to cheat whenever and how ever.
This investigator isn’t very good if he found no issues of substance in 2020 election when there is mounds of it.
How hard would it be to claim you ‘did the ‘research’ when you hadn’t actually done squat, and smile to yourself all the way to the bank.
“Why is it a score for mika to have a guy on her show seeking to say whatever he chooses?”
He might have tried, but Mika did call him out. Her questioning unsubtly suggested that he acted in an unethical manner.
Readers of my stuff know that I’m no fan of Mika, but credit where it’s due.
Like the fat bag of shit Bill Barr.
Are we sure this isn’t just a return to the Morning Joe strategy of 2016: Build up Trump in the primary so they can try to tear him down in the general?
See tagline.
Hearing Mika what little I do, I would never say that she is unbiased. Much the opposite, it seems.
Why does everybody jump over these findings:
—https://whyy.org/articles/u-s-supreme-court-reverses-pennsylvania-mail-voting-law-decision/
Perhaps corrupt. He may have been paid by another party ti do nothing or fund nothing.
File under anothe fine Trump hire.
So why did Trump hire him?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.