[SteveH]

this appears to be on a preliminary injunction. if so, the main case still needs to be heard, which means there is still a slim chance that the rule of law might prevail (yes?).

[OKSooner]

How do you figure that?

Or, just axing a question?

[WildHighlander57]

The quote from Texas AG Paxton mentioned “temporary”:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/4212201/posts

“
“The Supreme Court’s temporary order allows Biden to continue his illegal effort to aid the foreign invasion of America,” Paxton said in a statement. “The destruction of Texas’ border barriers will not help enforce the law or keep American citizens safe. This fight is not over, and I look forward to defending our state’s sovereignty.”
“

[bertmerc1]

this appears to be on a preliminary injunction. if so, the main case still needs to be heard, which means there is still a slim chance that the rule of law might prevail (yes?).

I'm surprised no one agreed with you on this point. I believe their vacating the injunction just sends the issue back to the appeals court for further deliberation.