This Shill article is just flat-out dumb agitprop hubris, by a smoke-blowing pole-smoking Libtard neckbeard who reeks of down-low catfish loserdom...
This Shill article is just flat-out dumb agitprop hubris, by a smoke-blowing pole-smoking Libtard neckbeard who reeks of down-low catfish loserdom...
"This leaves a variety of issues for the current justices to consider, as well as opportunities to avoid a politically volatile ruling on technical or procedural grounds. Instead, they should rule definitively to clarify the clause because Trump has created a political precedent in which we may see future attempts to overthrow the Constitution.""What are some of the key questions before the court?"1. "Does the clause apply to presidents?" No.
2. "Was the riot on January 6, 2021, an insurrection?" No.
3. "Did Trump participate?" Maybe he should have. If he had, maybe I wouldn't have to spend my valuable time responding to this fatuous, insufferable blog post.
4. "Shouldn’t it be up to voters whether Trump can be president again? The 14th Amendment states a qualification to serve as president, like the Constitution’s other requirements that a president must be a natural-born citizen of the U.S. and at least 35 years old. The Constitution’s qualifications are not subject to voter discretion." Exactly. So when Alito crams 14A so far down your gullet, don't complain when the political post-mortem endoscope shows what you had for breakfast -- a bowl full of marxist d---s.
There’s nothing like posing in front of venetian blinds that says, “I’m tough!”