Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thegagline
Sounds like someone was cutting into a crimes already owned by a syndicate, so the syndicate had law enforcement remove the competition.

Bribes are for the big guys, not the locals.

2 posted on 02/06/2024 8:49:59 AM PST by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: T.B. Yoits

Agreed. Not much has really changed since Tammany Hall days.


3 posted on 02/06/2024 8:53:17 AM PST by thegagline (Sic semper tyrannis! Goldwater in 2024 )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: T.B. Yoits

I knew of a case here in CT which could have gone sideways like these deals.

The developer paid bribes to a local mayor so he would not have to meet building codes for a big dollar building rehab.

The Mayor then chose the specific building inspector for the job who was compensated under the table for looking the other way.

The building rehab took a while—a couple of years—and everything was going according to plan...until....

The mayor decided not to run for re-election and at the same time the inspector decided to retire.

Fast forward a new legit inspector inspects the building and finds dozens of major issues requiring high six figures to remedy.

The developer (who I knew) could have refused to do the remediation which would have led to an unraveling of the entire scandal.

However he cursed and moaned at his bad luck—but did the repairs as ordered.


6 posted on 02/06/2024 8:59:07 AM PST by cgbg ("Our democracy" = Their Kleptocracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson