According to their MAIN goal, we can allow no more that half a billion people on the Earth.
That’s their ultimate goal!
But there are 8 billions of people now.
so 15/16 of the world population must be eliminated!
They cannot express this openly right now, as there would be uprising.
But, That’s where we are heading.
“But there are 8 billions of people now.
so 15/16 of the world population must be eliminated!”
Climate commies are neoMalthusians that much is clear. However resource depletion is a very real issue for a over populated planet. It doesn’t have to be a huge genocide to bring this planet back to its carrying capacity if you want everyone at European level of energy consumption a billion is the right number. More if you build out massively fast nuclear power reactors and synthetic fuel plants a LOT less if you intend on burning every drop of hydrocarbon underground. Which can never be done at any price point anyway. With 2024 dollars and a $300 bbl price point there is 49 years of liquid hydrocarbons left at 2023 consumption levels. When not if Asia,India and Africa demand their portion of the resources at Western consumption levels that drops fast in time. Coal is next up assuming you mined every seam that’s mineable and could burn It with scrubbers to keep the massive amounts of mercury,lead and heavy metals out of the watersheds you get 200 years or so why because you have to replace all the energy consumption from liquid hydrocarbons with less efficient coal to liquid synthetic fuel plants. It’s hideously expensive to put full scrubbers, particulate filters and acid gas capture on coal plants the scrubbers cost more than the turbines and the boilers. This is the primary reason America which has natural gas reserves for about 50 years switched to clean burning gas turbines. USGS shows that if we keep the gas for ourselves and not send it via LNG exports we have 80 years at 2022 consumption levels much less if you have to power your former liquid hydrocarbon fueled things off CNG,LNG or gas to liquid synthetic fuel. You see how this snowballs resource depletion is a very real issue. For humanity the only long term energy sources are fast spectrum nuclear power of which there is millions of years of fuel for. Solar energy in high insolation area’s like deserts just 3% of the Sahara could power all of humanity with only 12 hours of daylight it’s a storage and transport problem not energy available at ground level. The last form is biomass particularity from the oceans since 75% of our planet is ocean there is virtually unlimited space to grow kelp,algae or sea grasses.
How we get down to a billion ish people doesn’t have to involve genocide at all. The Western world already has birth rates below replacement of 2.2 per breeding pair. A global 2 child policy would bring the population down in four or five generations to a billion or less. A global one child could do it in two generations. The West is already voluntary doing a under two child policy so it’s racist to say hey maybe we force Asia India and Africa into a two or one child policy.