Can laws passed in the House during this period now be reviewed and be ruled unconstitutional?
I think little can be done at this point given the money has been spent so this ruling is mostly to set a precedent for the future.
“Given that this is for Fiscal Year 2023 we’re talking about here, the money has been spent. The congressman also notes it will be litigated further. Perhaps the largest takeaway, then, and the most optimistic of looking at it, is how “this is mostly for precedent. Roy also pointed out “proxy voting bad,” and Hendrix’s order highlighted the unconstitutionality of proxy voting at length.”