Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brilliant
"Highlighting the politically charged nature of the case, prosecutors objected to a set of questions proposed by the defense asking jurors if they are registered to vote, whether they vote with a particular party"

My take: the Feds know they won't have a stacked courtroom like they would in DC.

I'd love to see a prospective juror asked:
"How does it make you feel that the prosecution really would like a biased judge and jury like they can get in DC?"
I know that would never be allowed, but the responses would be interesting.

8 posted on 03/01/2024 5:51:20 AM PST by Tench_Coxe (The woke were surprised by the reaction to the Bud Light fiasco. May there be many more surprises)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tench_Coxe

“I know that would never be allowed”

Once the words are out of your mouth, they’re out there. Not an issue of “allowing”. Of course, you’d be off the jury for sure.


19 posted on 03/01/2024 6:31:12 AM PST by MayflowerMadam (Fraud vitiates everything." - SCOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson