I am not sure how the article and headline go together? If the requested testimony were allowed, it may show a few hundred dollars that she paid in the relationship but not much else. Why does the headline say it could sting her?
I believe it’s because she said she takes cash from her campaign money
Agreed.
I was just going to say that. She’s not stung by it, she wants it included as it’s her stupid fake made up evidence that she really did pay cash to this freaking loser Wade. What a scam. As if this would exonerate her at all. Not.
I think fat fanny testified that the relationship was over by Jan 2023. Another lie under oath.
My understanding is that if the judge opens up for more testimony the defense has a witness that served Wade and Bennett diner in the last 5 weeks. Showing wade lied to the court about not coordinating testimony with Bennett.