This article headline describes how she will be or could be stung by testimony thought to be in her favor BUT does not discuss how and leaves the reader to guess what the hell the author is intending to say.
It is quite possible that the author is trying to point out that Brody's testimony would backfire by showing how lavish Fani's and Wade's lifestyle is.
Bottom line though, the judge already knows about their lavish Grey Goose/fine wine lifestyle...so this article is an enigma.
Thyank you for unwinding Kate’s article
You could replace her as a journalist
“...so this article is an enigma. “
Consider the liberal media that published it. Maybe this is an attempt to front run any damning evidence and desensitize the public to her abuses by making the investigations of her actions seem petty.
Aimed at the court of public opinion, not what is going on in the actual courtroom.
You nailed it. Thank you. The article *is* confusing!
Has anyone looked at the reporting of cash tips received by Brody? Does his employer have a tally sheet for the tips?